Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

p. v

read more

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF

p. vii

At the University of California, San Diego, I am especially fortunate to share a world with a remarkable group of individuals, deeply committed to teaching and the rich pleasures of intellectual exchange. Members of this seriously eclectic community to whom I am hugely indebted for their insights and steadfast support as well as good humor include Carol Padden, Mike Cole,...

read more

Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-22

Rare is the case that the end we imagined at the beginning of a project is the end that we find or that finds us once all is at least provisionally said and done. It might be life or the world, each with its often unpredictable, surprising, and sometimes shocking turns; the work or critical interventions of like-minded (or not) scholars; it might be the unanticipated but unavoidable demands of narratives internal to the text itself that upset the particular trajectory one...

read more

1 Arendt and the Trial of Adolf Eichmann: Contextualizing the Debate

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 23-37

Evil in its total banality: this is what Hannah Arendt claimed to have seen in the figure of Adolf Eichmann when she observed him in an Israeli court in 1961. Eichmann was considered a core member of the Nazi leadership and would have undoubtedly been tried at Nuremberg in 1946 alongside Göring, Speer, and Hess among others for war crimes had he not fled Europe following the collapse...

read more

2 Ideology and Atrocity

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 38-63

Eichmann claimed to have been only a “transportation officer” in the elaborate bureaucracy that was the Third Reich. The details of his story and the nature of his position as he set out both for the Court in Jerusalem appeared only to frustrate the judges, mock the suffering of survivors, insult the memory of the dead, and enrage the prosecution, so inadequate was his account of the phenomenon...

read more

3 Thoughtlessness and Evil

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 64-91

What makes judgment possible, Arendt argued, are the purging effects of critical thought, the disassembling of received customs, rules, opinions, codes of conduct, and established values that may otherwise come to function as banisters of a sort to which we grow habituated and on which we may depend, not as the cultural conventions they represent, but as part of the given architecture of...

read more

4 “Crimes against the Human Status”: Nuremberg and the Image of Evil

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 92-113

We saw in chapter 1 that the Eichmann trial was made to bear a host of burdens well beyond the otherwise highly choreographed spectacle of criminal prosecution. Whether by chance, opportunity, or design, the proceedings were put in the service of a number of consequentially distinct agendas for regionally distinct audiences, with the focal point throughout being the “story of the great...

read more

5 The Banality of Evil

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 114-124

At the beginning of chapter 3, I began the discussion of Arendt’s understanding of thoughtlessness by recounting an exchange she had with Christian Bay at a conference devoted to considering the import of her work. This exchange was precipitated by a general discussion of what “thinking is and is good for” but also, more specifically, by Bay’s insistence that with the exception of Eichmann...

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 125-163

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 165-185

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 187-198

read more

About the Author

pdf iconDownload PDF

p. 199

Valerie Hartouni is Professor of Communication at the University of California, San Diego, and author of Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life (1997).