The Semantics of Analogy
Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia
Publication Year: 2010
Published by: University of Notre Dame Press
Title Page, Copyright Page
This work began as a doctoral project at the University of Notre Dame, and through its gestation there and subsequent development into the present form I have incurred many debts. I mention first Gyula Klima, who introduced me to medieval philosophy, and from whom I tried to learn as much as possible through ...
Now, the question “To what question did So-and-so intend this proposition for an answer?” is an historical question, and therefore cannot be settled except by historical methods. When So-and-so wrote in a distant past, it is generally a very difficult one, because writers (at any rate good writers) always write for their contemporaries, and in particular for those who are ...
Introduction: Some Theoretical and Historical Preliminaries
This introduction is intended to orient those readers who may not already be familiar with discussions of the history of analogy and the place of Cajetan’s treatise within that history. It first presents a brief overview of some of the key concepts covered by the term ‘analogy,’ not in specific matters of theology or metaphysics, but in considera-...
Part 1. Cajetan’s Question
Chapter One. Systematizing Aquinas?: A Paradigm in Crisis
Cajetan’s theory of analogy has hardly been neglected by modern scholars. Its influence on all subsequent discussion of analogy has been widely felt and recognized, by both Cajetan’s defenders and his critics. As we will see in this chapter, however, debates about Cajetan’s theory of analogy have taken place within a framework of common ...
Chapter Two. Reconstructing Cajetan’s Question: The Semantic Intent of De Nominum Analogia
What is De Nominum Analogia about? A scholastic commentator would raise this question in terms of several more specific ones. A proper prologue, according to longstanding medieval convention, communicates not only the title (titulus) of the work, the name of the author (nomen auctoris), and the order of its parts (ordo libri), but also ...
Chapter Three. Analogy, Semantics, and the “Concept vs. Judgment” Critique
Some critics of Cajetan who have discerned his general semantic intent have charged that Cajetan’s theory had to fail because of this very intent. If these critics are correct, Cajetan’s theory of analogy is historically significant for exposing weaknesses latent in medieval semantic assumptions. According to the critics, the Aristotelian as-...
Chapter Four. Some Insufficient Semantic Rules for Analogy
Cajetan’s interest in a semantic analysis of analogy was not only theoretically interesting and appropriate, but urgent. Cajetan’s teaching on analogy must be understood as an attempt to respond to a particular challenge, issued most famously by Scotus, that analogy, understood as a mean between univocation and equivocation, is semantically im-...
Part 2. Cajetan’s Answer
Chapter Five. Cajetan’s Semantic Principles
In response to objections to a semantic analysis of analogy, we began to examine Cajetan’s semantic principles in chapter 3. There I clarified that for Cajetan the concept was simply that which mediated thought; a concept is simply the intellectual intention by virtue of which someone understands something. Thus, we saw, the concept played a role ...
Chapter Six. The Semantics of Analogy: Inequality and Attribution
This is the first of four chapters that directly explicate Cajetan’s teaching on analogy in De Nominum Analogia. It will consider his definitions of analogy at the beginning of that treatise, and his relatively brief discussions of analogy of inequality and analogy of attribution. It is relevant to begin, however, with a consideration of two ...
Chapter Seven. The Semantics of Proportionality: The Proportional Unity of Concepts
We have seen that analogy of attribution is a species of equivocation in which the different concepts are related, so that the ratio of one appears in the definition of the others. This seems to be the most obvious mean between univocation and equivocation. But for Cajetan there is another mean: analogy of proportionality. This will turn out ...
Chapter Eight. The Semantics of Proportionality: Concept Formation and Judgment
If analogy of proportionality is superior because its diverse concepts are proportionally the same, it remains the case that what it means to have two concepts proportionally the same is obscure—as Cajetan himself admits at the end of the third chapter of De Nominum Analogia.1 As a true mean between univocation and equivocation, analogy ...
Chapter Nine. The Semantics of Proportionality: Syllogism and Dialectic
In the middle chapters of De Nominum Analogia, with their continued emphasis on concepts, Cajetan at first glance seems to be primarily concerned with matters of epistemology or philosophical psychology. The concern, however, remains properly logical or semantic. The common theme is the acquisition, structure, and deployment of ...
Modern scholarly discussions of Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia have focused on the question of Cajetan’s fidelity to Aquinas. But in seeking an answer to that question, the scholarly debate lost sight of the question or questions that motivated Cajetan to write De Nominum Analogia, and so lost sight of the most appropriate perspective from ...
Page Count: 280
Publication Year: 2010
OCLC Number: 760170562
MUSE Marc Record: Download for The Semantics of Analogy