We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE

Spin Cycle

How Research Gets Used in Policy Debates--The Case of Charter Schools

Jeffrey R. Henig

Publication Year: 2008

One important aim of social science research is to provide unbiased information that can help guide public policies. However, social science is often construed as politics by other means. Nowhere is the polarized nature of social science research more visible than in the heated debate over charter schools. In Spin Cycle, noted political scientist and education expert Jeffrey Henig explores how controversies over the charter school movement illustrate the use and misuse of research in policy debates. Henig’s compelling narrative reveals that, despite all of the political maneuvering on the public stage, research on school choice has gradually converged on a number of widely accepted findings. This quiet consensus shows how solid research can supersede partisan cleavages and sensationalized media headlines. In Spin Cycle, Henig draws on extensive interviews with researchers, journalists, and funding agencies on both sides of the debate, as well as data on federal and foundation grants and a close analysis of media coverage, to explore how social science research is “spun” in the public sphere. Henig looks at the consequences of a highly controversial New York Times article that cited evidence of poor test performance among charter school students. The front-page story, based on research findings released by the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), sparked an explosive debate over the effectiveness of charter schools. In the ensuing drama, reputable scholars from both ends of the political spectrum launched charges and counter-charges over the research methodology and the implications of the data. Henig uses this political tug-of-war to illustrate broader problems relating to social science: of what relevance is supposedly non-partisan research when findings are wielded as political weapons on both sides of the debate? In the case of charter schools, Henig shows that despite the political posturing in public forums, many researchers have since revised their stances according to accumulating new evidence and have begun to find common ground. Over time, those who favored charter schools were willing to admit that in many instances charter schools are no better than traditional schools. And many who were initially alarmed by the potentially destructive consequences of school choice admitted that their fears were overblown. The core problem, Henig concludes, has less to do with research itself than with the way it is often sensationalized or misrepresented in public discourse. Despite considerable frustration over the politicization of research, until now there has been no systematic analysis of the problem. Spin Cycle provides an engaging narrative and instructive guide with far-reaching implications for the way research is presented to the public. Ultimately, Henig argues, we can do a better job of bringing research to bear on the task of social betterment.

Published by: Russell Sage Foundation

Title Page, Copyright Page

pdf iconDownload PDF


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. v-vi

About the Author

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. vii-viii


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. ix-x


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. xi-xii

read more

1. The New York Times/AFT Charter School Controversy

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 1-14

August 17, 2004, was a warm day in Washington, D.C., the temperature in the eighties, the tail end of an unusually cool and wet summer, the time of year that political activists, public officials, and journalists sometimes refer to as the summer doldrums. For the rest of the year...

read more

2. Informed Democracy: An Ideal and Its Skeptics

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 15-32

The idea that wise governance should be guided by science has deep roots. Some would trace them to the founding of the nation. Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and others who set the country on its course were, by almost all accounts, wise statesmen who framed their...

read more

3. How Cool Research Gets in Hot Waters: Privitization, School Choice, and Charter Schools

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 33-55

Those who labor in the fields of social science and education research are accustomed to laboring in obscurity. The 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, held in San Francisco between April 7 and April 11, included 1,946 substantive panels, at which 8,361 scholars presented papers and 12,444 researchers—including...

read more

4. Research in the Public Eye:Personalization, Polarization,and Politicization

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 56-89

In 1991, when Minnesota put into place the nation’s first charter school law, charter schooling was a little more than a notion. The notion was that schools would perform better if held accountable for results than constrained by bureaucratic regulations about process. This simple notion...

read more

5. Research Outside the Spotlight: Accumulation, Convergence, Contingency

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 90-127

The public face of charter school research is not a pretty one. Advocates at each extreme wave studies to support their position and claim that their opponents are willfully perverting the canons of social science methodology to mislead the public and gain higher political ground...

read more

6. Follow the Money: The Role of Funding in the Politicization of Education Research

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 128-176

We have been wrestling with a puzzle. Research has been converging on an understanding of charter schools that provides a mixed, nuanced, and somewhat complicated picture; one that does not fit neatly into the simple narratives of the political right or political left. The public...

read more

7. How Research Reaches the Public Ear: Old Media and New

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 177-216

Other things were happening on August 16, 2004, the day before the New York Times ran its front page story on the AFT charter school report. Here is a sampling of the stories the Times ran deeper in the paper on August 17. On page 10, it reported that an American journalist had...

read more

8. Can the Ideal of Informed Democracy Be Revived?

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 217-245

Bad news and good news are intertwined in this story. The bad news is that the idealized vision of knowledge and democracy is once again shown to be naïve. The Progressives believed that expertise and democracy could be neatly apportioned, each to its own realm. Democracy...

Appendix 1. List of Those Interviewed

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 246-247

Appendix 2. Diana Jean Schemo, "Charter Schools Ttrail in Results, U.S. Data Reveals, "New York Times (Late Edition, East Coast), August 17, 2004, p. A1

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 248-251

Appendix 3. "Charter School Evaluation Reported by The New York Times Fails to Meet Professional Standards"

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 252-254


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 255-272


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 273-286


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 287-300

E-ISBN-13: 9781610442855
Print-ISBN-13: 9780871543394

Page Count: 312
Publication Year: 2008

OCLC Number: 835513934
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Spin Cycle

Research Areas


UPCC logo

Subject Headings

  • Education -- Research -- Political aspects -- United States.
  • Charter schools -- Government policy -- United States.
  • Charter schools -- Political aspects -- United States.
  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access