Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Title Page, Copyright

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

read more

Preface

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-xviii

It is difficult to pinpoint precisely the moment at which a social, cultural, or intellectual movement begins. By most accounts, the contemporary environmental movement in the United States can be traced back to the late 1960s and early 1970s, when then-Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin declared the first Earth Day, thus inaugurating...

Abbreviations

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. xix-xx

read more

Introduction: Facing Nature after Levinas

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-10

Emmanuel Levinas (1906–1995) is widely considered the most significant ethical thinker in twentieth century Continental philosophy. Levinas regarded the demise of humanism, together with the horrific traumas that marked the twentieth century, as fundamental challenges to morality and ethics. In the famous sentence...

read more

1. Alterity, Value, Autonomy: Levinas and Environmental Ethics

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 11-24

Within recent years, a number of attempts have been made to read the works of Emmanuel Levinas through an “environmental” lens. Oftentimes the goal of these attempts has been to discern whether or not there is in Levinas an environmental ethic, or at least some sort of an environmental consciousness, and to this end they have engaged...

read more

2. Facing Animals

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 25-40

It is true to say that Levinas, like so many philosophers before him, attached no great ethical importance to animals other than humans (hereafter simply, “animals”). For over four decades, Levinas developed a theory of ethics he called a “humanism of the other man” that viewed animals as little more than things or cases, the interests of...

read more

3. Agency, Vulnerability, and Societas: Toward a Levinasian Politics of the Animal

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 41-66

In his work of 1906, The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals, E. P. Evans examines dozens of legal trials held before lay and ecclesiastical courts of medieval Europe against various kinds of animals, insects, and even plants. At issue was their culpability in an assortment of “crimes” against human society, such as the destruction...

read more

4. Scarce Resources? Levinas, Animals, and the Environment

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 67-94

Readers have persistently noted the absence of animal others in Levinas’s philosophy. They have worried about the humanism and anthropocentrism of his ethics. They have suggested that what concern for the environment is conveyed by his works is at most an interest in stewardship of the natural world for the sake of human ends...

read more

5. Ruined Faces

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 95-108

A few years ago I became misplaced in hot stony tropical country near the Daly River in the Northern Territory of Australia. My companions had taken a little side trip and had failed to return; there came a time when I realised that I could wait no longer. Dehydrated and slightly disoriented, I looked off to the west. I knew that the road...

read more

6. Levinas and Adorno: Can There Be an Ethics of Nature?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 109-134

A common flaw in many contemporary discussions of the environment, including environmental activism and philosophical approaches in environmental ethics and environmental phenomenology, is its ahistorical character. Animals, ecosystems, environments, landscapes, that is, all that we associate with the ambiguous and problematic word...

read more

7. The Earthly Politics of Ethical An-archē: Arendt, Levinas, and Being with Others

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 135-160

An ecological politics must be informed by the ethical, rather than just the instrumental, importance of the more-than-human world. Without such ethics “nature” is regarded only as a resource to be divided between human protagonists. Such a resource-based politics would not be ecological in any important sense since it can relatively...

read more

8. Enjoyment and Its Discontents: On Separation from Nature in Levinas

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 161-190

The radical break that Levinas’s philosophy represents with the history of ethics has seemed promising to environmental thinkers searching for a non-anthropocentric account of nature’s moral claim on us. For Levinas, the ethical command is the very epiphany of the face of the Other that confronts me from a height, from beyond being. Breaking...

read more

9. Earthly Morality and the Other: From Levinas to Environmental Sustainability

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 191-208

“I beseech you, my brothers, remain faithful to the earth, and do not believe those who speak to you of otherworldly hopes!” Almost at the beginning of the twentieth century, such is Zarathustra’s message to the people. It is a message uttered in the shadow of the death of...

read more

10. Rethinking Responsibility in an Age of Anthropogenic Climate Catastrophe

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 209-228

This year, many thousands of people will die as a consequence of malaria moving to higher altitudes, a shift made possible by warmer temperatures. Do we bear any moral responsibility for their deaths? And do we bear any moral responsibility for the loss of the stunning...

read more

11. Toward a Relational Model of Anthropocentrism: A Levinasian Approach to the Ethics of Climate Change

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 229-252

Although there is a history of political emergency situations, examples of such emergencies in ethical theory are far less common. One possible exception to this is Michael Walzer’s notion of a “supreme emergency,” which he develops in Just and Unjust Wars. Walzer appropriates this phrase from Winston Churchill’s account of Britain’s...

read more

12. The Anarchical Goodness of Creation: Monotheism in Another’s Voice

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 253-278

The Abrahamic traditions — Judaism, Christianity, and Islam — have unswervingly insisted on circumscribing their embrace of the living world, even as they affirm it as G-d’s unique and inimitable creation. For Creation calls forth an ambivalent response in these traditions, which find the living world to offer both an invitation...

read more

13. Witness to the Face of a River: Thinking with Levinas and Thoreau

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 279-300

Levinas is witness to the Shoah; Thoreau is witness to a river, a pond. What can either say to the other? They might converse about witness and first person address and the importance of both, especially when clouded in one’s own or another’s affliction, say remembering or living through the tragic or traumatic. Moments of pain can be...

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 301-348

About the Contributors

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 349-352

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 353-359

Back Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF