The Civil War Confiscation Acts
Failing to Reconstruct the South
Publication Year: 2005
Published by: Fordham University Press
Title Page, Copyright Page, Dedication
This book began as a dissertation over 35 years ago when I was a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin. Professor Stanley I. Kutler suggested the topic and advised me along the way to its completion. Without his interest and advice on how to proceed, it probably would not have been finished. I was not the most persistent student, and his patience with me proved a blessing, both...
In the summer of 1861, as slaves entered Union lines and the North faltered on the battlefield, Congress passed the First Confiscation Act, the text of which can be found in the appendix to this book. Proposed by Republican Senator Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, the first act meant to confiscate property, primarily slaves, used to aid the Confederacy. Although the act freed few if any slaves, in part...
Chapter 1: The First Confiscation Act
Samuel Gridley Howe and other abolitionists believed that with the firing on Fort Sumter, God had ‘‘opened the way’’ for the emancipation of the slaves and the subjugation of the ‘‘Slave power.’’1 This, to be sure, was a view only a small minority shared when the Civil War began on April 12, 1861. Most in the North, including President Abraham Lincoln, hoped that the war...
Chapter 2: The Second Confiscation Act: The Act and Its Opponents
By December 1861 there were several indications in the North that some form of confiscation, mostly related to slavery, had gained public support. In Massachusetts, Amos Lawrence, a merchant and abolitionist, wrote the editor of a Boston newspaper that he supported ‘‘the policy of confiscating the property and freeing the slaves’’ of all rebels. In Philadelphia, Sidney...
Chapter 3: The Second Act: Divided Republican Support and Flawed Result
Republican differences over the Second Confiscation Act reveal the limits of the radicals’ influence in the Thirty-seventh Congress, at least on confiscation. The ineffective provisions of the second act also demonstrate the distaste for special legislation, as Michael Les Benedict has termed it, in mid-nineteenth century. If Senators Sumner, Wade, and Trumbull and...
Chapter 4: Enforcement of the Second Act: Lincoln and Bates
Although Lincoln acknowledged the importance of the second act in a number of instances in the weeks after its passage, he and Attorney General Edward Bates chose not to implement the law vigorously. Lincoln used the second act in various ways, but not to punish those who aided the rebellion or to change the property relations in the South. In the end, the...
Chapter 5: Early Military Confiscation
The military commanders and troops who conquered and occupied the South were potentially the best enforcers of the confiscation acts. They encountered confiscable property before any other government officials and, through martial law, could have prevented transfers of property titles. However, they could not confiscate property without going through the courts....
Chapter 6: Rules of War and Later Military Confiscation
The military’s participation in confiscation occurred during a period of critical discussion about the rules of war. This discussion was clearly important for the conduct of the Civil War and later conflicts, but it did not have much effect on how the military involved itself with confiscation. The debate over the rules of war was, nonetheless, for it explains how both civilians...
Chapter 7: The Treasury’s Part in Confiscation
If anyone in the administration might have had sympathy for confiscation and its aims, it should have been Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase. He certainly had the greatest antislavery and radical reputation of the men Lincoln chose for the Cabinet.1 As well, the Treasury Department was authorized to handle a diverse assortment of property in the South as it followed...
Chapter 8: The Politics of Confiscation
The failure of the confiscation acts, particularly the second, owed much to the inattention and declining interest of the Republicans in Congress. Except for one inquiry about implementation in the District of Columbia in early 1863, Republicans ignored the acts until early 1864. Although Congress had created the Committee on the Conduct of the War to monitor...
Chapter 9: Andrew Johnson and the End of Confiscation
The succession of Andrew Johnson to the presidency in April 1865 produced a shift in the enforcement of the confiscation acts. Lincoln had implemented the acts conservatively with the willing assistance of Attorney General Bates. When it suited his plans for emancipation, Lincoln had invoked the second act. Otherwise, until his December 1863 proclamation on...
Chapter 10: Confiscation and the Courts: Jurisdiction and Procedures
Despite the expectations of both confiscation’s supporters and opponents, the Supreme Court liberally interpreted the First and Second Confiscation Acts. It granted Congress the benefit of the doubt on jurisdictional and procedural questions and accepted the constitutional argument for confiscation, thereby permitting the acts as broad a scope as their...
Chapter 11: Confiscation and the Courts: Constitutionality and Duration
The Supreme Court’s decisions on substantive confiscation issues were important for several reasons. The support for confiscation’s constitutionality in Miller v. United States (1870)1 vindicated those who had proposed and supported the First and Second Confiscation Acts in Congress. Although two justices did dissent in Miller over its constitutionality, the majority’s...
Chapter 12: Conclusion
Although the confiscation acts did not accomplish their goals, they were still important measures that represented many Northerners’ concerns about how the war should be prosecuted and applied pressure on President Lincoln to expand the Union’s objectives. They promised a radical alteration of property relations in the South and the prospect of distributing land...
Page Count: 296
Publication Year: 2005
OCLC Number: 156268037
MUSE Marc Record: Download for The Civil War Confiscation Acts