We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE

Intifada Hits the Headlines

How the Israeli Press Misreported the Outbreak of the Second Palestinian Uprising

Daniel Dor

Publication Year: 2004

In this nuanced and detailed study of newspaper reporting during the escalation of the second Intifada in the fall of 2000, Daniel Dor shows how real events are subject to distortion and manipulation by the media. In an analysis of the heart of Israel's media establishment -- the newspapers Yediot Ahronot, Ma'ariv, and Ha'aretz -- he finds a wide gap between the reality reported by field reporters and the eventual newspaper accounts framed by editors. Led by beliefs, opinions, and emotional responses rather than the facts provided by their reporters, these editors created a platform on which a new and fearful narrative for Israeli--Palestinian relations was built. Yet while Dor demonstrates that the media construct the news rather than simply report it, his sophisticated analysis also shows that no one entity or person is responsible. Rather than a supreme authority, Dor argues, it is the influence of fear, anger, ignorance, and a desire to please and sell newspapers that threatens the freedom of the press in a liberal democracy.

Published by: Indiana University Press

Series: Indiana Series in Middle East Studies


pdf iconDownload PDF


pdf iconDownload PDF
p. v

read more


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. vii-viii

Three years after the outbreak of the second Palestinian Intifada, public opinion polls consistently tell a paradoxical story: On the one hand, they show that substantial majorities on both sides, Israelis and Palestinians, understand and accept the basic parameters of the final settlement. On the other hand, the polls also show that each side is deeply...

read more


pdf iconDownload PDF
p. ix

I would like to thank Miran Epstein, Avi Weinberg, Jacky Hugi, Yehiel Limor, Rafi Mann, Moshe Negbi, and Haim Rechnitzer for their help with the original Hebrew version of the book, and Jérôme Bourdon, Dafna Lemish, Gabi Lanyi, and especially Chuck Salmon for...

read more

1. Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 1-17

On Friday the 13th, October 2000—two weeks after the outbreak of the Palestinian uprising that later came to be known as the “El-Aqsa Intifada”— the local Tel Aviv supplement of Israel’s most popular daily, Yediot Ahronot, published a survey conducted by the Geocartographia Institute among Arab and Jewish residents of Jaffa. The investigators were...

read more

2. “Under Arafat’s Baton”

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 18-34

The first newspaper reports of the “El-Aqsa Intifada” reached the newsstands on Monday, October 2, after a weekend extended by the Jewish New Year (Rosh Hashana). In the preceding three days, the Jewish residents of the country had watched in fear and anger the harsh, incomprehensible television images: thousands of Arabs hurling rocks, burning...

read more

3. “Make No Mistake, Yasser”

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 35-53

The two factual statements that came to dominate newspaper headlines during the first two days of the Intifada—the “fact” that Arafat had initiated and planned the riots, and the “fact” that he used Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount as an “excuse”—remained at the core of the news coverage of the Intifada throughout the...

read more

4. “The Limits of Restraint”

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 54-82

As we have seen in the preceding chapter, Barak’s ultimatum captured the Sunday papers’ main headlines. The main front page headline in Ha’aretz is: BARAK’S ULTIMATUM TO ARAFAT: CEASE FIRE BY TOMORROW OR NEGOTIATIONS ARE OFF. Under another front page headline—ISRAEL PLANNING A SERIES OF SANCTIONS—the newspaper...

read more

5. “A Fifth Column”

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 83-104

On Yom Kippur eve, October 8, about twelve hours after the apocalyptic morning newspapers hit the stands, thousands of Jews throughout Israel took to the streets. They had decided to deal personally with what Yoel Markus had called, in the above paragraph, “the real problem.” In Nazareth, Karmiel, and Tiberias, in Hatikva neighborhood...

read more

6. “In All Their Murderous Ugliness”

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 105-129

The second week of the Intifada—a short week that started the day after Yom Kippur, Tuesday, October 10—was burned into the Israeli collective memory as the week during which it finally “became clear” that the Palestinians had turned their backs on the peace process and were doing everything possible to drag Israel into...

read more

7. “We Have Turned Every Stone”

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 130-154

On Monday, October 16, only four days after the Palestinians were “exposed in all their murderous ugliness,” Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat met again, at the Sharm el-Sheikh summit in Sinai. The newspapers reporting the planned summit, on Sunday the 15th, expressed considerable...

read more

8. Conclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 155-170

During the first month of the Intifada, the Jewish public in Israel went through a radical transformation in its perception of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In social-psychological terms, this change can be characterized on the basis of the distinction between tractable and intractable conflicts (Kriesberg 1993; Bar-Tal 1998, 2000, 2001): In the Oslo period, from...


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 171-174


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 175-178


pdf iconDownload PDF
pp. 179-184

E-ISBN-13: 9780253110732
E-ISBN-10: 0253110734
Print-ISBN-13: 9780253343338

Page Count: 200
Publication Year: 2004

Series Title: Indiana Series in Middle East Studies
See more Books in this Series

OCLC Number: 61519779
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Intifada Hits the Headlines

Research Areas


UPCC logo

Subject Headings

  • Jews -- Israel -- Attitudes.
  • Arab-Israeli conflict -- 1993- -- Press coverage -- Israel.
  • Press and politics -- Israel.
  • Mass media -- Political aspects -- Israel.
  • Arab-Israeli conflict -- 1993- -- Mass media and the conflict.
  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access