Legal Ideology of Removal
The Southern Judiciary and the Sovereignty of Native American Nations
Publication Year: 2002
Because the federal government upheld Native American self-dominion, southerners bent on expropriating Indian land sought a legal toehold through state supreme court decisions. As Garrison discusses Georgia v. Tassels (1830), Caldwell v. Alabama (1831), Tennessee v. Forman (1835), and other cases, he shows how proremoval partisans exploited regional sympathies. By casting removal as a states' rights, rather than a moral, issue, they won the wide support of a land-hungry southern populace. The disastrous consequences to Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles are still unfolding.
Important in its own right, jurisprudence on Indian matters in the antebellum South also complements the legal corpus on slavery. Readers will gain a broader perspective on the racial views of the southern legal elite, and on the logical inconsistencies of southern law and politics in the conceptual period of the anti-Indian and proslavery ideologies.
Published by: University of Georgia Press
In the 1830s the state of Georgia seized the land of the Cherokee Nation, divided it up into parcels, and sold it in a lottery to the citizens of the state. My ancestors lived on land they acquired in one of the Cherokee land lotteries. Since becoming familiar with the story of the Indian Removal, I have acquired a deep sense of guilt about that personal heritage. I think ...
In the fall of 1837, John Ross, the principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, traveled to Washington to meet with Martin Van Buren, the president of the United States. Van Buren had established May 23, 1838, as the final date for the removal of the Cherokees, and Ross hoped to persuade the president either to postpone the deadline or, even better, to renegotiate the ...
CHAPTER ONE: Removal: The Separation Solution
John Mitchell, an English cartographer and botanist, was perhaps the first to propose removing the Indians in eastern North America beyond the reach of white settlement. In 1767 he pointed out that the Indian tribes were the only obstacle preventing Great Britain's colonies from expanding all the way to the Mississippi River. Mitchell suggested that the British ...
CHAPTER TWO: Spiritual Sovereignty: The Emergence of the Cherokee Nation
On July 4, 1827, a convention of twenty-four delegates from the eight districts of the Cherokee Nation met in New Echota to draft a national constitution. Though the convention implemented a number of civil reforms, it essentially left the existing legal and political structure in place. The nation was already governed by a chief executive called the principal chief and a ...
CHAPTER THREE: The Precedents: Sources of Law for the Southern State Courts during the Removal Crisis
American judges during the Removal Crisis had a relatively fertile literature at their disposal when they considered the question of what rights the Indian tribes possessed in the United States. They looked, for example, to the scholarship on the law of nations produced by legal and political philosophers of the colonial era. They also reviewed the English common ...
CHAPTER FOUR: The Supremacy of State Jurisdiction: Georgia v. Tassels
The Cherokee Nation's promulgation of a republican constitution in the summer of 1827 enraged the removers in Georgia. Rather than fostering support for their cause with the federal government, the Cherokees had essentially unified the southern states against their position. Georgia responded to the Cherokees' declaration of independence with its own ...
CHAPTER FIVE: Domestic Dependent Nations: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Despite John Ross's optimism, the execution of George Tassel was a devastating setback to the Cherokees' legal strategy. To make matters worse, in 1830 Andrew Jackson suspended annuity payments to the Cherokees. Jackson reportedly said that he "would not break sticks to put in other people's hands to break his own head with." He would not, in other words, ...
CHAPTER SIX: The Southern Response to Marshall: Caldwell v. Alabama
Perhaps a clear pronouncement in favor of Indian sovereignty by a united Court in Cherokee Nation would have stalled the fervor for removal. More than likely, though, it would have only pushed Georgia so far toward rebellion that the state might have joined South Carolina in its nullification challenge to the federal government. Instead, Marshall's refusal to grant ...
CHAPTER SEVEN: Sovereign Nations: Worcester v. Georgia
The major newspapers in Alabama and Georgia did not mention James Caldwell's case. Instead, editorial interest remained focused on Georgia, where a group of Congregational missionaries were challenging the state's authority to extend its jurisdiction over the Cherokee Nation. By the 1820s, more than thirty missionaries from several Christian denominations were ...
CHAPTER EIGHT: The Law of the Land: Tennessee v. Forman
The Georgia government had never allowed the Worcester controversy to deter it from its removal strategy. During the course of the case, the state had proceeded with the survey, lottery, and sale of the Cherokee Nation's lands. By the time the state released Worcester and Butler from the penitentiary, hundreds of white Georgians had purchased lots to 40- and 160-acre ...
EPILOGUE: The Triumph of the Southern Removal Ideology
The bitter division between the Ross and Treaty parties, which devolved into civil war in the Indian Territory, was only one of the consequences of the Indian Removal. Clearly the greatest tragedy of the Removal was the staggering death toll produced by the forced march to Oklahoma. The general consensus among scholars is that approximately four thousand ...
Page Count: 336
Publication Year: 2002
Series Title: Studies in the Legal History of the South
See more Books in this Series
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Legal Ideology of Removal