In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The Catholic Historical Review 88.3 (2002) 603-605



[Access article in PDF]

Book Review

Secularisation in Western Europe, 1848-1914


Secularisation in Western Europe, 1848-1914. By Hugh McLeod. (New York: St Martin's Press. 2000. Pp. xii, 387. $65.00 clothbound; $19.95 paperback.)

Finely nuanced yet bold in conclusion, this study shatters the widespread assumption in western Europe that secularization inevitably accompanies the emergence of modern industrial, urban society. Professor McLeod bases his comparative study not so much with reference to the United States, where organized religion remains conspicuously strong, as by concentrating on western Europe itself, in particular on France, on the German Empire as defined in 1871, and on England, excluding the religiously distinct fringes of the United Kingdom. Temporally he concentrates on the years during which secularization is supposed to have become ascendant, between the middle of the nineteenth century, when by McLeod's own account, "going to church on Sunday or to communion at Easter were things taken for granted by the majority of the population," and the outbreak of World War I, when such practices "were the exception rather than the rule" (p. 178). [End Page 603]

There has long been plenty of evidence that religious belief and practice remained and grew only stronger in the country where industrial revolution began, in England. As McLeod points out, "The period from the 1850s to the 1880s was one of exceptional prosperity in the history of the English churches, in which every social class and political faction was to some degree reached by one of the many religious denominations and levels of involvement were high" (p. 48). The political movements of liberalism, radicalism, and socialism that had strongly secularizing affinities in France and Germany continued to take religious forms in England. But before the reader can conclude that England must have followed its own Sonderweg in religion, McLeod points out the crosscurrents everywhere. Among Protestants in Germany, for example, the decline in religious practice began long before the onset of industrialization; on the other hand, the "[a]rtisans and shopkeepers, who in Germany were often regarded as the most devout section of the urban population in the second half of the nineteenth century, were in France regarded as the group most prone to militant anti-clericalism" (p. 132).

The highlighting of national differences in a comparative study is not surprising. More remarkable is the common "key to the religious situation in later nineteenth-century Europe" that McLeod finds in pluralism. His argument in this regard, the central thesis of the book, merits quotation in full: "trends towards secularisation have to be seen in the context of intense religious competition, whether between rival branches of Christianity or between religious and secular views of the world. Nineteenth-century pluralism did not necessarily lead to the skeptical relativism that some writers have suggested: in fact there can have been few periods of history in which fervent ideological commitments of varying kinds were so widely held. Rather than seeing secularisation as an impersonal 'process' (the term most commonly used in the sociological historical literature), it would be better to see it as a 'contest', in which adherents of rival world-views battled it out" (p. 28). This thesis is persuasive because it helps to account for the contrasts and crosscurrents that McLeod accentuates, for the areas and social strata where religion flourished in one country but not in another. It thus throws common assumptions into question and suggests replacements, for example, that religion was the opiate, not of the masses, but of the affluent. McLeod's thesis also enables him to restore human agency to the conflict between religion and skepticism, to rescue the subject from "the grip of inexorable and impersonal forces, operating largely independently of anyone's volition" (pp. 84-85) by showing where and explaining how the battle energizedpeople of different persuasions in different corners of the battlefield differently.

While doing so, this study clarifies the outcome of the struggle rather than leaving it uncertain. In all three countries that McLeod examines, secularization advanced much farther in some spheres...

pdf

Share