In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Community Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Translational Research and Researchers
  • Jeannine S. Skinner, PhD, Neely A. Williams, MDiv, Al Richmond, MSW, Jen Brown, MPH, A. Hal Strelnick, MD, Karen Calhoun, MA, E. Hill De Loney, MA, Shauntice Allen, PhD, Alex Pirie, BA, and Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI

What Is the Purpose of this Study/Review?

  • • To understand community representatives' views on their involvement in clinical and biomedical research, researchers, and how community is valued in research.

  • • To determine influencers of community trust in research and researchers' value of community.

What Is the Problem?

  • • Community representatives are increasingly involved in research in roles such as advisors, consultants, and community partners. Little is known regarding their views on barriers, facilitators, and indicators of successful community engagement in research.

What Are the Findings?

  • • A diverse group of 109 community members representing community organizations, faith-based organizations, public health agencies, and businesses participated in study.

  • • Most community members did not view researchers as well-prepared to engage communities and few community members believe resources are available to adequate support community involvement.

  • • Most community stakeholders (66%) were compensated for their involvement in research, but only 40% perceived compensation to be appropriate.

  • • Trust of research and perceptions that researchers value community were positively associated with perceptions of appropriate compensation.

  • • Community representatives view the most important indicators of success as involving community in all stages of research, from study design to sharing results.

  • • Key facilitators of engagement include the importance of research to the community and use of culturally appropriate communications.

Who Should Care Most?

  • • Community members, community organizations, health researchers, and funding agencies. [End Page 239]

Recommendations for Action

  • • Researchers and research institutions should develop and implement strategies to engage community members in all phases of research and appropriately compensate them for their work.

  • • Funding agencies and academic institutions should create policies and infrastructure to prepare researchers to engage communities and provide adequate resources to facilitate engagement. [End Page 240]

Jeannine S. Skinner
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Neely A. Williams
Community Partners Network
Al Richmond
Community-Campus Partnerships for Health
Jen Brown
Alliance for Research in Chicagoland Communities, Northwestern University
A. Hal Strelnick
Einstein-Montefiore Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
Karen Calhoun
City Connect Detroit
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research
E. Hill De Loney
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research
Shauntice Allen
School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Alex Pirie
Immigrant Service Providers Group/Health
Consuelo H. Wilkins
Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Meharry Medical College
...

pdf

Share