- Modes of Popular Mobilizations against Authoritarian Rulers: A Comparison of 1989, the Color Revolutions, and the MENA Uprisings
- Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization
- Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University
- Volume 26, Number 2, Spring 2018
- pp. 149-171
- View Citation
- Additional Information
Since 1989, regime transitions from authoritarian to more (and sometimes fully) democratic rule have taken place through four processes: popular protests, roundtables between the regime and the opposition, elections, and, finally, elections followed by popular protests that ensure that the victorious opposition is allowed to take power. We argue that these contrasting modes of regime change depend on whether the authoritarian regime is competitive (allowing competition for power at the national level) or non-competitive and whether the regime is more or less repressive. These factors affect the strength of the opposition and the mechanisms available to them to win power. Popular protests take place in repressive, non-competitive regimes; roundtables in less repressive, non-competitive regimes; electoral transitions in less repressive, competitive regimes; and transitions involving elections combined with protests in more repressive, competitive authoritarian regimes.