In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The Catholic Historical Review 86.3 (2000) 535-536



[Access article in PDF]

Book Review

Disturbing the Peace:
A History of the Christian Family Movement, 1949-1974


Disturbing the Peace: A History of the Christian Family Movement, 1949-1974. By Jeffrey M. Burns. (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. 1999. Pp. vii, 296. Paperback.)

This interesting history of one of the lay movements in the postwar American Catholic Church provides another look into the world of Catholic Action. Burns describes how a generation of young married Catholic couples were inspired by the Cardijn method and the theology of the Mystical Body to change their neighborhoods and the world. Although Patrick and Patricia Crowley are known as Mr. and Mrs. CFM, Burns shows that the establishment of CFM was the result of a number of interested married couples who had been meeting in various cities from 1946 to 1949. In the summer of 1949, lay delegates and priests met at a retreat center outside Chicago for the three-day meeting that laid the groundwork for CFM. Burns also does a good job of providing the social and ecclesiastical context in which CFM was established and grew.

The author balances the story of the internal issues affecting the group and its rapid growth with the story of how CFM groups related to the wider world. National leaders regularly discussed an early tension within CFM between family development or social action. Burns describes how this internal question shaped the issues, which CFM addressed in subsequent decades.

Because CFM ". . . perceived themselves to be an avant-garde with a mission to bring the American church into the modern world" (p. 4), the issues of race, gender and sexuality, ecumenical relations, and the implementation of Vatican Council II became the topics of very lively discussion. The four chapters of the [End Page 535] book that deal with these themes provide the most interesting reading. The contribution that the Crowleys made to the Papal Birth Control Commission and their subsequent opposition to Humanae Vitae is a minor episode of the book, since Robert McClory already has told that story. Instead Burns places it within the larger discussion of gender and sexuality issues that CFM was addressing. The avant-garde nature of CFM (a perceived liberal agenda) led not only to some healthy criticism by members but also to the loss of members. The expansion of CFM to Mexico and other Latin American, African, and Asian countries demonstrates the global reach of the movement. The connection with Marriage Encounter forms a part of this particular theme of the book.

The one issue that deserves greater attention by the author relates to the ecumenical efforts of CFM. On page 154, Burns quotes an Episcopal priest, Donald Jones, a member of CFM, as claiming that at the 1968 national convention the group "'officially broke formal ties with the Roman Catholic Church.' . . . The same claims were made in a letter sent out to all CFMers." Further information on the impact of this claim and on the relationship between CFM, bishops, chaplains of CFM, and the United States Catholic Conference is a story line that needs a fuller explanation than Burns provides.

In his conclusions, Burns provides a balanced analysis for the successes, failures, and limitations of CFM. The social and ecclesiastical turbulence of the post-Vatican Council II era took its toll on CFM. The challenge of CFM to negotiate the troubled waters of this era was not unique to the Christian Family Movement. A number of Catholic organizations were facing similar challenges.

Martin Zielinski
University of St. Mary of the Lake
Mundelein Seminary

...

pdf

Share