In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Finding Franklin: The Untold Story of a 165-Year Search by Russell A. Potter
  • Shane McCorristine (bio)
Finding Franklin: The Untold Story of a 165-Year Search
by Russell A. Potter; pp. 280. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP, 2016. $39.95 cloth.

This book looks at the series of obsessive efforts to solve the most famous mystery of polar exploration—the disappearance of the Franklin expedition. Led by Sir John Franklin, this British Admiralty expedition departed [End Page 148] London in 1845 in the ships Erebus and Terror in search of a northwest passage connecting the Atlantic with the Pacific Ocean. By 1848, when no contact had been made with the expedition, a diverse array of people and institutions across the world mobilized to plan, direct, and participate in search and rescue expeditions that mapped much of what is now the Canadian Arctic. By the mid-1850s, when it was clear there could be no survivors, the aims of the Franklin searchers switched to collecting Inuit testimony about what had happened and locating documents, burial sites, artifacts, and even the elusive ships in an effort to reconstruct the expedition’s events.

In a clear and free-flowing writing style, Potter’s Finding Franklin focuses first on the types of evidence that have haunted Franklin searchers for generations—the bones and grave sites that have been located, the canned food the expedition carried, and the sparse documents recovered—namely the “Victory Point” record and the “Peglar Papers.” He then moves on to cover the efforts of dozens of Franklin searchers and researchers, such as Dr. John Rae in 1854, showing how each contributed new evidence and hypotheses that, mosaic-like, have allowed us to reconstruct much of what happened.

Books about the Franklin expedition are numerous but largely repetitive. For much of the twentieth century, most historians reconstructed events based on information contained in the “Victory Point” record recovered by Leopold McClintock’s expedition in 1859. This traditional account argues that a general sickness (lead poisoning, botulism, or scurvy) decimated the crew and that the ships were abandoned in April 1848 near King William Island before a death march south toward the Great Fish River and the Canadian mainland. Aside from these arguments, there were debates about the value of the Inuit testimony collected by Rae and the American searcher Charles Francis Hall, the evidence for or against cannibalism, and whether Franklin and his men were bumbling imperialists with little knowledge of, or care for, local means of inhabiting the Arctic environment. Potter’s achievement is to show, in a methodical fashion, how Inuit accounts from the 1840s and 1850s led directly to the location of the Erebus in 2014 by Parks Canada.

The key methodological shift in Franklin expedition scholarship in recent years came with David Woodman’s Unravelling the Franklin Mystery: Inuit Testimony (1991). Woodman went back to Hall’s notes and journals from the 1860s to challenge the traditional account of the disaster and carefully piece together a narrative based on the oral testimony of Inuit. Woodman also emphasized the location of relics, bodies, and other artifacts to paint a picture of multiple abandonments of the ships and multiple groups moving in different directions, some of which returned to the Erebus and piloted it south to where it sank in the Utjulik region. This narrative would account for stories of separate groups of white men encountered by Inuit far from the Great Fish River and stories of survivors still interacting with Inuit well into the 1850s. As Potter points out, Woodman connects historical scholarship and [End Page 149] respect for oral testimony on the one hand with the upsurge in field expeditions using side-sonar scanning equipment to search for the ships in the 1990s and 2000s on the other. Although Woodman did not locate the ships himself, his work, along with the consultation of the Inuk historian Louie Kamookak, were crucial in allowing Parks Canada to successfully narrow their multi-vessel searches to particular areas.

Like Woodman, Potter believes Inuit testimony about the expedition to be “the single most important body of evidence we have” (106). Potter is a careful historian whose analyses about...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 148-150
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.