Abstract

This article considers Coleridge’s comment that in the best poetry one cannot change a word. It compares Kant’s seemingly opposed insistence that ideas of perfection have little role in our judgments of beauty. The article proposes that these positions are actually compatible, due to the “thingly quality” (Heidegger) that pertains to the best work, its mysterious sense of finish. We have no ultimate idea what such a thing is or might do, such that it could be perfect at it. Or changed. But is the presence of this irreplaceable, thingly quality any less a matter of taste than beauty itself?

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-329X
Print ISSN
0190-0013
Pages
pp. 400-415
Launched on MUSE
2018-02-08
Open Access
N
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.