Abstract

Abstract:

This article discusses the potential of satire as a valuable source of knowledge for historical research, specifically for understanding the Dutch Age of Revolution (c. 1780-1800). Using the practice of petitioning—the submission of formal requests by (groups of) citizens—as a case study, it argues that satire can lay bare feelings and opinions that non-satirical sources cannot. More specifically, satirical sources address problems that in other sources are deemed taboo, as they conflict with the existing political consensus. Thus, studying satire enables historians to better understand the tensions hidden beneath the surface of a given historical epoch.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-315X
Print ISSN
0013-2586
Pages
pp. 219-233
Launched on MUSE
2018-01-06
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.