Abstract

“The pursuit of national glory,” which M. Steven Fish counts among the features of Vladimir Putin’s “populism,” is emerging as central to the regime’s legitimation. Unlike previous instances of patriotic mobilization (around the Second Chechen War and the 2008 Georgia war), the current one appears to have evolved into a permanent structure sustaining Putin’s regime. As a result, of the two presidential roles that undergird what Kirill Rogov called Putin’s “supermajority”—which safeguards Putin’s popularity even in tough economic times— that of “savior and protector of the nation” has all but supplanted that of “wealth manager.” The most probable threat to Putinism’s survival in the short term lies in the possibility that efforts to bolster the credibility and salience of the “savior and protector” narrative may lead to a foreignpolicy setback.

Abstract

“The pursuit of national glory,” which M. Steven Fish counts among the features of Vladimir Putin’s “populism,” is emerging as central to the regime’s legitimation. Unlike previous instances of patriotic mobilization (around the Second Chechen War and the 2008 Georgia war), the current one appears to have evolved into a permanent structure sustaining Putin’s regime. As a result, of the two presidential roles that undergird what Kirill Rogov called Putin’s “supermajority”—which safeguards Putin’s popularity even in tough economic times— that of “savior and protector of the nation” has all but supplanted that of “wealth manager.” The most probable threat to Putinism’s survival in the short term lies in the possibility that efforts to bolster the credibility and salience of the “savior and protector” narrative may lead to a foreignpolicy setback.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3214
Print ISSN
1045-5736
Pages
pp. 76-79
Launched on MUSE
2017-10-07
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.