In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
AVANT GARDE MUSEOLOGY edited by Arseny Zhilyaev. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 2015. 576 pp., illus. Paper. ISBN: 978-0-81669919-3.

inline graphic Avant Garde Museology is an anthology of documents, prose, fragments and experiments from the period of post-revolutionary Soviet Union museum practice that until now have been dispersed and unavailable in English. The translated collection draws together ideas that share, as editor Arseny Zhilyaev suggests, a common theme, that is, the project to reconstitute the museum as an institution of hope as opposed to the old order that ordained its own ideals and objects to the cost of the majority. The unfinished project heralded in this collection—of which the advent of Stalinism reversed what achievements had been made—is an approach to the museum that is active and alive, alongside the undertaking to rebuild a fairer society.

The anthology, aimed at art historians, archivists and cultural theorists, brings together a lightly curated selection of documents and projects. It represents a missing compendium to the movements that are recognizable as the outputs of the Russian revolution, such as constructivism and social realism, and to the dominant narrative of the museum as a Western modernist enterprise. The book is divided into six sections—"Museum as Common Task," "The Museum of Avant-Gardism," "The Materialistic Museum," "The Museum Outside of the Museum," "Museum of the History of the Revolution" and "The Atheists' Museum"—expounding various principles and concepts that were being developed toward the notion of avant-garde museology that Zhilyaev postulates as the framing device for this collection. The anthology as a whole, as Zhilyaev acknowledges in his introduction, is not an academic text as such nor is it a rigorous analysis of the project proposed in the title of the book. Rather, it is an attempt to open up for the reader the field of museum studies alongside art history to an invaluable moment in our cultural, aesthetic and historical heritage that has not been so readily available.

The first section of the book spends much time with the work of Nikolai Fedorov, whose ideas resonate throughout the book's entirety, as well as in part with Zhilyaev's notion of avant-garde museology. The religious philosopher Fedorov was one of the major contributors to Russian cosmism, the movement that saw the fusion of science, nature, religion and technology promoting the evolution of human beings beyond the earth and into the cosmos. For Fedorov the museum becomes a site from which humanity can transcend both physical and social limitations. The museum must collect everything that is produced. The current model of the museum is not unified; it is full of discord and disunity and hence mirrors humanity. There must be a movement both in society and in the museum toward brotherhood. This is achieved through the building of museums as churches where investigation into the human condition is essential; the scholars of the museum [End Page 217] are its congregation that seek answers through its commission, a place to resolve humanity's discord.

Another example that resounds with the organizing theme of the book is an excerpt from Platanov's novel Chevengur "The Revolution Memorial Reservation." A satire on the years following the uprising, the "memorial reservation" holds on to all that was good from the revolution, concepts of brotherhood and equality that were the lifeblood of revolutionary action. The newly conceived post-revolutionary town has none of this energy, creativity and fraternity; rather, the banalities and bureaucracies of lawmaking and order persist. The excerpt points to the contradiction of holding the revolution as an eternal moment; the conundrum is resolved in a way by the witty optimism of the reservation's warden and Platanov's idiosyncratic prose.

There are many proclamations within the collection, such as "The Museum of Avant-Gardism," which should address itself to that which lives according to the artist Kazimir Malevich. His denunciation of the museums of old reflects the declarations of the Futurists that the new museums should dedicate themselves to that which is alive or can produce new forms of life. The collection also highlights the various struggles and attempts to approach museology as a dialectical...


Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.