-
Faulkner the Stoic: Honor, Evil, and the Snopeses in the Snopes Trilogy
- Philosophy and Literature
- Johns Hopkins University Press
- Volume 39, Number 1A, September 2015
- pp. A260-A279
- 10.1353/phl.2015.0030
- Article
- View Citation
- Additional Information
Were William Faulkner’s characters determined to their actions, perhaps by cosmic forces or divine providence, causal laws or genetic traits? In brief, no. Still, I argue that Faulkner does employ hard determinism in relation to one character, and this character represents an important exception: Flem Snopes of the Snopes trilogy. Flem Snopes’s brand of evil was not moral evil (i.e., evil characteristic of genuine agents) but instead a distinct variety of metaphysical evil. In order to demonstrate this, I contrast the moral psychology of Flem with that of his murderer, Mink Snopes, by appeal to the Faulknerian virtue of honor.
-
If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.
-
-
You are not currently authenticated.
-
View freely available titles:
Book titles OR Journal titles
-