Abstract

Using facts about scientists’ incentives in doing research, I argue that a purely heuristic defense of scientific modeling should be cautiously approached. Firstly, due to the need for mathematical tractability, those employing analytic models have an incentive to employ known mathematical structures. This makes it unlikely that their models can suggest novel conclusions. Secondly, while those employing simulations are generally better off in this respect, a look at the details of the way the models are being used is necessary here, too, as there are often prior simulations that can be used as templates for new ones.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1530-9274
Print ISSN
1063-6145
Pages
pp. 424-442
Launched on MUSE
2015-11-13
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.