In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Different Shades of Green: African Literature, Environmental Justice, and Political Ecology by Byron Caminero-Santangelo
  • Sarah Harrison
Different Shades of Green: African Literature, Environmental Justice, and Political Ecology BY BYRON CAMINERO-SANTANGELO Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2014. x + 214 pp. 9780813936062 paper.

As the first published monograph on African environmental literature, Byron Caminero-Santangelo’s Different Shades of Green is an important intervention into the thriving field of postcolonial ecocriticism. Building on his earlier coedited essay collection, Environment at the Margins: Literary and Environmental Studies in Africa (2011), this interdisciplinary work draws on political ecology, environmental history, and environmental activism in order to provide a timely new assessment of the depth and breadth of environmental engagement in African letters.

Caminero-Santangelo’s project raises two key questions, both of which he answers with clarity and conviction. The first queries whether ecocriticism offers a viable framework for the exposition of African literature, given the field’s longstanding affiliation with Western environmentalisms that have tended to idealize an untouched nature at the expense of acknowledging the mutually shaping forces of indigenous peoples, colonial conquest, migration, and globalization. Conscious of this precedent, Caminero-Santangelo’s first chapter on “The Nature of Africa” usefully critiques the “environmentalism of the affluent” to be found in “settler pastorals” and travel writing by such authors as Karen Blixen, Elspeth Huxley, and Paul Theroux, whose privileging of wildlife conservation and landscape preservation is endorsed by many so-called “first-wave” ecocritics.

In its place, he advocates an ecocritical framework that draws on political ecology in its insistence on the interconnectedness of environmental issues and political questions. This allows him to make a persuasive argument for a more inclusive definition of African environmental writing. Taking as “environmental earlier and more recent African writing that is outside or marginal to dominant notions of environmentalism,” Caminero-Santangelo effectively “challenge[s] hegemonic notions of what that term might mean” (30). If social struggles are inseparable from ecological transformations and vice versa, as he argues, then a wide range of African texts can be seen to develop an ecological sensibility, even those that do not provide an explicit or lengthy engagement with environmental concerns. For example, environmental degradation in Ngũgĩ’s A Grain of Wheat has often been read as a symbol of post-independence social decay. However, Caminero-Santangelo’s interdisciplinary framework suggests that the novel’s linkage of a seemingly anthropocentric concern with indigenous land rights to environmental problems such as soil erosion and infertility is more “historically and ecologically astute” than previously considered (52). Both emerge within the shared context of a harmful colonialism that degrades both Gĩkũyũ culture and local natural resources.

By usefully expanding the scope of ecocriticism to include a broad array of African texts, Different Shades of Green raises a second question of scale that demands a methodological solution. How can postcolonial ecocriticism balance detailed analysis of local environmental concerns and their literary expression [End Page 176] with a rigorous attention to the global relationships and processes within the context of which they emerge? In response, Caminero-Santangelo develops a reading strategy he terms “postcolonial regional particularism,” which is simultaneously “concerned with the history of global relationships, with the need to interrogate imperial universalizing discourses, and with local alterity” (9).

In subsequent chapters on works from East Africa, South Africa, and Nigeria, his rigorous close readings are, following Said, deliberately contrapuntal, placing texts from different periods and places into productive conversation. This is perhaps most effective in chapter four, “The Nature of Violence,” in which both the enduring legacy and contemporary limitations of Ken Saro-Wiwa’s activist writings are revealed not only by comparison with recent Niger Delta poetry by Tanure Ojaide and Ogaga Ifowodo, but also through retrospective dialogue with Chinua Achebe’s well-known Arrow of God.

The impressive corpus of anglophone environmental writing that CamineroSantangelo assembles would undoubtedly be enriched by the inclusion of literature in African languages. However, in keeping with his stated aim of crafting a “more decentered, globally attuned (if more fraught) ecocriticism,” this omission is best taken as an invitation (9). In its commitment to interdisciplinarity and analytic flexibility, Different Shades of...

pdf

Share