Abstract

This article explores the question of why the history of Israel and Judah, according to the books of Kings, ends in disaster (2 Kings 25). Although this question has been intensely discussed, especially since Martin Noth’s Überlieferungs­ geschichtliche Studien (1943), no entirely convincing solution has been offered. The argument suggests a new explanation of the ending of Kings from the perspective of its textual pragmatics. The narrative of the finding of the “book of the torah” during Josiah’s reign (2 Kings 22–23) is seen to refer readers emphatically to Deuteronomy. The laconically disastrous end of 2 Kings 24–25 proves the accuracy of Moses’ predictions of exile. Readers who wish to know about the possibilities for Israel’s future are bound to reread Deuteronomy 29–30, the only text in which Moses refers to the return to the promised land (Deut 30:1–10). They are thereby taken into the dynamics of the Moab covenant (Deuteronomy 29–30). Kings does not console its readers with a happy ending but forces them to turn to Moses’ rhetoric of blessing and curse and to make their decision between life and death (Deut 30:15–20).

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1934-3876
Print ISSN
0021-9231
Pages
pp. 711-728
Launched on MUSE
2014-12-19
Open Access
No
Archive Status
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.