We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR
Questions Concerning Certain Claims Made for the ‘New List’
Abstract

Abstract:

Peirce’s early essay ‘On a New List of Categories’ has been claimed to be essential reading for those who would understand his philosophy, even that it is the ‘keystone’ of his ‘system’. I argue that the essay is critical to the evolution of his thought but that reading it is not essential to understanding his other writings; in fact, his later writings contradict it. Peirce’s own claim that this essay contains his ‘one contribution to philosophy’ has been misunderstood.



Research Areas

Recommend

  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access