Abstract

Background: Community advisory committees (CACs) increasingly are formed to cultivate partnerships between researchers and communities.

Objectives: This article details the processes used to recruit CAC members, the purpose and structure of the committees, members’ motivation to participate, and examples of member input and influence.

Methods: In-depth interviews, meeting notes, and partners’ reflections were synthesized to identify key lessons regarding establishing and sustaining effective CACs.

Lessons Learned: Findings highlight the need for partner agreement on the role of CACs, structured meeting procedures, intentional integration of CAC input into project activities, and training on sharing research information with the community.

Conclusions: CAC members’ expertise regarding indigenous culture and experiences increased the project relevance for workers and strengthened research and intervention efforts. Members also reported greater knowledge of safety, health, and workers’ rights, and increased confidence to share information. This influence extends beyond the project and contributes to sustained change among CAC members and in the participating communities.

pdf

Share