-
The Knowledge of Ignorance from Genesis to Jules Verne by Andrew Martin (review)
- L'Esprit Créateur
- Johns Hopkins University Press
- Volume 28, Number 1, Spring 1988
- pp. 106-107
- 10.1353/esp.1988.0040
- Review
- Additional Information
Book Reviews A ndrew M artin. T h e K n o w l e d g e o f Ig n o r a n c e f r o m G e n e s is t o J u l e s V e r n e . C am bridge: Cam bridge University Press, 1985. P p. x + 259. Acknowledging the impossibility o f starting at an absolute beginning, the first chapter o f this intriguing study, following a prefatory hors d ’œ uvre that clearly m aps out his architectural gam e-plan, introduces the interm ediary status o f the texts M artin studies, from Genesis through Nicholas o f Cusa and Rousseau to French writers of the Rom antic period, including N apoleon, and culm inating in the scientific fictions of Jules Verne: he interprets the texts o f each o f these authors as discursive shuttles which m ediate and m iti gate between the poles o f such pervasive binary oppositions as knowledge and ignorance, civilization and barbarism , and last but not least, especially in its im plications for con tem porary theory, science and literature. The resolution M artin offers to the problem atic tensions between these cultural anti nomies involves the notion o f their reversibility: he suggests that the conflicting couples are not m utually exclusive but reciprocally nutritive, like twins in a sym biotic relationship. Each text invokes an antithesis, designed to order (chrono)logical and epistemological priorities, “ but w riting, m ediating between extrem es, enforcing a process of exchange on a relation of opposition, seems to be incapable of sustaining a stable duality. Each category affirm s overtly the exclusion or annihilation o f an opposite which it covertly assim ilates” (181). T hroughout the book, M artin convincingly m aintains his dialectical definition of the reversible process o f twin contestants w ithout ignoring the ensuingly paradoxical conflicts. This book brilliantly considers writing as a resistance to traditional binary theological (om niscience/nescience), chronological (beginning/end), figurai (night/day), and spatial (East/W est) oppositions. Discourse, M artin argues, synthesizes the dissolution of these epistemic enemies into allies as the one becom es the other. As a study that openly adm its its own reductive and inexhaustive deficiencies, The Knowledge o f Ignorance is sure to arouse stim ulating intellectual controversy in the academic arena. It is a com plim ent to the success of the very am bitious project M artin has set for himself that the scope of his book does m irror the rival patterns whose textual models he explores, without falling into the m ytho logical pit of duality: it is the business of this study to show everything and nothing without saying it. T hroughout his own text, M artin skillfully integrates gram m atical, discursive, and philosophical aspects o f the (an)epistem ic status of knowledge, tracing the edifying yet sub versive desire o f writing in different periods to construct a discursive archive of knowledge, like an im aginary library. M artin confesses that his m ethod is “ strictly bricolage” (7) in its com bination o f aspects of literary criticism , the history of ideas, and philosophical treatise. The intellectual density of provocative ideas in this book is lightened by the econom ic den sity o f M artin’s prose which is peppered with refreshing hum or and a fondness for w ord play; his excellent transitions between sections and chapters facilitate the tem poral and spatial leaps between the textual outposts of his study. In the central chapter he persuasive ly dem onstrates the m utual complicity of the otherwise bipolar model in 19th-century French writing: the “ civilizing m ission” of the West in the East, including N apoleon’s cam paign in Egypt, results in the image of an Orientalized Occident reflected in H ugo’s and C hateaubriand’s assim ilation of a “ benighted E ast” into the “ enlightened W est.” The final chapter, “ The Scientific Fictions of Jules V erne,” is the most fully-developed, a reprise of the alim entary philosophy “ connaître, c’est m anger” from the garden o...