In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Sacaton Red and the Norton Allen Collection DAVID E. DOYEL Sacaton Red, an understudied Hohokam pottery type, is the focus of this paper. In the overview I first summarize the distribution and recovery contexts of the type from sites including Snaketown, Gatlin, Frogtown, Las Colinas, and other sites with significant Sacaton Phase occupations. A second and primary objective is to describe ten Sacaton Red vessels curated at the Arizona State Museum (ASM) in Tucson. I then discuss the development of this pottery within the framework of the Hohokam cultural tradition. Observations include that Sacaton Red is a relatively rare type with a broad but uneven distribution, and that specialized production is indicated. Emil W. Haury’s original description (1937:202–4) of Sacaton Red from Snaketown still forms the basis for the type description, which has been expanded by subsequent research. It is an uncommon type that usually occurs in bowl forms, with red-slipped and sometimes lightly tool-polished interiors, with exterior surfaces ranging in color from mottled brown to gray, and with fire clouds common. It constituted less than 1 percent of the pottery from Snaketown. Haury (1976:222) notes that the type “carries a heavy amount of temper, both angular and rounded quartz grains, and much mica, probably derived from crushing mica-schist.” Petrographic analysis by Nora Gladwin indicated that it was produced at Snaketown (Gladwin et al. 1937:204). The ASM database lists nine items from Snaketown; unusual forms include an effigy fragment and a leg from a tripod vessel. Vessel shapes include hemispherical and shallow bowls and plates. Although jar forms are present, an illustrated small-shouldered jar from a cache does not conform to the type based on the stated criteria (Haury 1976:fig. 11.8i) but does appear to be a polished red ware. Vessel size ranges from 6.3 DAVID E. DOYEL received his PhD in anthropology from the University of Arizona. For two decades he has supervised the development of a cultural park at Gatlin Site National Historic Landmark for the Town of Gila Bend. Currently he is a U.S. Air Force cultural resource manager for the Barry M. Goldwater Range in southwest Arizona. Journal of the Southwest 52, 2 and 3 (Summer-Autumn 2010) : 277–298 278 ✜ JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHWEST to 15.8 cm high (average 11.0 cm), and 14.5 to 35.5 cm in diameter (average 22.4 cm); the largest known Sacaton Red bowls were recovered from this site (Barstad 1999 illustrates several of these vessels). Of these Sacaton Red items, four are from cremations, two from house floors, and two from grids. Sherds were recovered from at least eleven houses, a canal, and three trash mounds. Excavations at Frogtown, a hamlet or small village along the Salt-Gila Aqueduct on the eastern side of the Phoenix Basin, produced 170,388 sherds. Of these, 1,294, or 0.76 percent, were identified as red ware, of which 920 were Sacaton Red (Sires 1984; Bernard-Shaw 1984:448). Sherds were recovered from at least seven houses and several trash features. A single Sacaton Red bowl and several plain ware vessels were associated with a human cremation burial at this site. David R. Abbott’s (1984:62) analysis of sherds from three localities along the Salt-Gila Aqueduct documented Sacaton Red at field house, farmstead, and hamlet sites (including Frogtown), indicating its presence at multiple types of sites. Spatial variation was suggested in vessel form (small- versus medium-sized bowls), and possibly in temper types involving the variable presence of feldspar. Sherds were slipped on the interior; the exteriors were not well finished and rarely exhibited polishing striations, although a bowl with exterior patterned polish striations is illustrated (Abbott 1984:62–63, 79). The variation in the project assemblage was similar to that at Snaketown, which led Abbott to suggest a unified tradition with a limited production area. Sacaton Red was recovered from Las Colinas in west Phoenix, in the lower Salt River Valley, where it accounted for less than 1 percent of sherds from feature assemblages (Abbott 1988; Abbott and Gregory 1988:15–16). Two distinct temper types were identified: one contained large to small...

pdf