In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Technology and Culture 45.1 (2004) 154-158



[Access article in PDF]

Up, Down, Across:
Elevators, Escalators, and Moving Sidewalks
At the National Building Museum, Washington, D.C.

Robert M. Vogel


We are told in the introductory panel of this unusual and interesting exhibit that the ubiquitous people movers of its title log more passenger miles each year than automobiles, airplanes, or trains. It is estimated that the world's elevators, escalators, and moving sidewalks collectively move the equivalent of the earth's population every three days—a figure that some of us might question when we consider the assembled inhabitants of China, India, and what used to be the USSR. Moreover, we learn that the moving sidewalk, a mode of transport that most of us would regard as having been introduced within living memory, actually appeared at several late-nineteenth-century world's fairs. These devices now are found principally at airports, enabling the building of those annoyingly long "finger" subterminals—referred to in the exhibit, somewhat curiously, as "horizontal skyscrapers."

Before commenting on the exhibit itself, it will be appropriate to say something of its setting. The National Building Museum is a public-private partnership located in what is widely viewed as Washington's most spectacular building, a massive brick structure designed in 1882 by General Montgomery C. Meigs, one of the nineteenth-century's most creative and productive engineer-architects, to house the office dispensing pensions to war veterans and their survivors. Like a number of the city's more splendid late-Victorian federal buildings, it came within a whisker of demolition in the singularly unenlightened 1960s. Following a tasteful restoration, it first sheltered several historical agencies and now is occupied largely by the Building Museum. Its outstanding feature is a huge central atrium—long, wide, and high, dominated by two rows of four colossal Corinthian [End Page 154] columns (plastered and marbleized brick) supporting the central roof structure—said, quite believably, to be the largest in the world. This dramatic space is used by the museum principally for special events, the exhibit galleries proper being located in former offices along the perimeter on the ground and second floors. This arrangement results in rooms that are none too spacious for their purpose, but many of the partition walls have been removed, creating adequately long, if narrow, galleries.



Click for larger view
Figure 1
Section of time line with one of the models built for the exhibit. (Allan Sprecher photo.)


Up, Down, Across: Elevators, Escalators, and Moving Sidewalks (which closes 18 April 2004) aims at examining every possible aspect of these three "human conveyance" systems, including their history and technology, the variety of psychological effects they exert on their users, their considerable influence on architecture and planning, and anticipated future developments both likely and fantastical (such as elevators to outer space). Not surprisingly, the exhibit was sponsored by United Technologies Corporation, which in 1976 purchased the Otis Elevator Company. Although Otis is the acknowledged world leader in elevator and escalator construction, further lack of surprise arises from the conspicuous dearth of references in the exhibit to the numerous other firms in the business. This is reflected as well in the superb, extensively illustrated catalog—really a book—of the same [End Page 155] title accompanying the exhibit, edited by Alisa Goetz, the museum's and the exhibit's assistant curator (Merrell: London and New York, 224 pp., $24.95). The catalog mentions Otis's historic archcompetitor Westinghouse only once, merely observing in passing that at one time neither firm chose to bid on an unconventional elevator job.



Click for larger view
Figure 2
Escalator (and related) steps. At bottom, step from a man lift; next, wood-cleat step from Macy's escalator, 1902. (Allan Sprecher photo.)


The most striking, and regrettable, aspect of this exhibit is its nonmuseological approach to its subject. If we recall that a museum is by definition a place where explication is intended to be based upon objects, what are we to make of an exhibit that is so lacking...

pdf

Share