In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

portal: Libraries and the Academy 3.4 (2003) 695-696

[Access article in PDF]
An Action Plan for Outcomes Assessment in Your Library, Peter Hernon and Robert E. Dugan. Chicago: American Library Association, 2002. 192 p. $49 softcover (ISBN 0-8389-0813-6)

Academic librarians have been struggling with outcomes assessment for several years. Many are still confused about what outcome measures are and why they are necessary, much less how to implement them. Authors Hernon and Dugan, who have both done extensive work on library evaluation and assessment, intend this book to provide practical help to librarians creating and implementing outcomes-based assessment plans.

Hernon and Dugan begin with the basics, clarifying the difference between evaluation and assessment and among inputs, outputs, and outcomes. They define learning outcomes (the primary focus of much of the book) as measurable changes in student attributes and abilities resulting from the educational process. The authors emphasize that assessment focuses on reviewing and improving institutional effectiveness, although external agencies may use the results for accountability. Their introductory overview of assessment is set in the context of new accreditation requirements, and they briefly summarize the stance of each of the major regional accrediting bodies for higher education. Subsequent chapters cover assessment plans at the institutional level, the development of a separate library assessment plan, and assessment of information literacy efforts. These include numerous examples from existing plans, with references to documents on the Web pages of various institutions. Dugan describes the assessment planning process at his own library (Sawyer Library, Suffolk University) at length throughout the book and includes several relevant planning documents in the appendices. As a whole the first four chapters offer a brief but sound introduction to compiling an outcomes assessment plan.

The fifth chapter, "Moving Public Libraries toward Outcomes Assessment," momentarily shifts the focus from academic to public libraries. Hernon and Dugan argue that public libraries should also undertake outcomes assessment, and they adumbrate some possible approaches to this. The remainder of the book focuses predominantly on academic libraries. Whatever the merits of outcomes assessment for public libraries, the primary locus of this process to date has been in the academic setting and nearly all of the documentation [End Page 695] and examples provided in the volume relates to academic libraries. The treatment of public libraries might well have been saved for a separate monograph.

The remainder of the work deals largely with assessment methodologies. Hernon and Dugan offer numerous examples of outcomes assessment methods used in various libraries, such as portfolios, testing, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. They do a good job of briefly describing each method, presenting advantages and drawbacks, and supplying references to more detailed treatments. A number of sample surveys and tests are included in the appendices. Anyone in need of ideas for assessment techniques will find this a good starting place. In addition to covering some of the easier, less rigorous methodologies, the authors offer a relatively long chapter on "The Research Process," that discusses undertaking more rigorous measures from a theoretical viewpoint. Readers with formal training in social science research methods may either skip it or use it for a quick review. Those without such training may find it rough going, and possibly more confusing than helpful.

The penultimate chapter covers service quality and satisfaction. Although the authors note that these are not really outcomes measures, they emphasize both as important to a library's overall assessment plan. Much of this chapter revolves around Hernon's experiences in adapting the SERVQUAL methodology to library services at Yale. The treatment is clear and useful, but mention of the major implementation of this methodology in academic libraries, LibQUAL+, is relegated to a single footnote. One can only assume the manuscript was completed too early to take full account of this development. Readers will need to supplement this chapter with the rapidly growing literature on LibQUAL+.

The final chapter offers caveats, perspectives on likely future developments in assessment, and encouragement to those undertaking assessment planning and implementation. Overall, Hernon and Dugan have provided a sound introduction to assessment...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 695-696
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.