In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The Catholic Historical Review 89.4 (2003) 806-807



[Access article in PDF]
After "The Year Eighty":The Demise of Franciscan Power in Spanish New Mexico. By Jim Norris. (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. Published in cooperation with the Academy of American Franciscan History. 2000. Pp. xi, 212. $39.95.)

In 1680 New Mexico's Spanish rulers, after more than a century of seeming success, suffered a devastating Native American revolt; all soldiers, missionaries, and settlers were killed or expelled. In 1692 the authorities of Church and State began a campaign of reconquest, and the Franciscan friars who joined the struggle prospered somewhat, chiefly in the Pecos Valley between Albuquerque and El Paso. The troops protected them, although not every village required a garrison; several Puebloan villages accepted and supported them; they rebuilt churches and taught children, at least, religious doctrine. Many inhabitants realistically accepted baptism for the sake of Spanish protection from Comanches and Apaches. The settlement at Abiquiu, founded for genizaros, native people rescued from slavery to these warlike tribes, showed them that without their alien overlords they risked another, more terrible subjugation. The Crown helped the missions financially, and love of the Gospel animated many friars who accompanied or soon followed the army. Thus the Franciscans, Custody of the Conversion of Saint Paul, began the eighteenth century zealously, with effective secular support and with an externally submissive flock. Jim Norris's book narrates and explains the slow decline, almost to disappearance, of the friars' prestige and influence.

The men who refounded the New Mexico missions were generally inept; their energies soon flagged, and their successors were sometimes idle or corrupt. Unprepared for hard village conditions, often solitary, often transferred around New Mexico, the friars usually achieved little. The Puebloans were almost the only natives to whom they directed even token evangelistic efforts; they tried to reach the Hopi and Zuni, but avoided the Comanches, Utes, and other groups. Mission villagers acquired little Spanish, and only three eighteenth-century friars learned even one of the several native languages. One active, capable priest wrote a catechism in a native language, but scarcely anyone used it. Only one congregation learned many hymns; several villages returned to kiva rituals and to sorcery, the priests either indifferent to such paganism or fearing for their safety if they objected. Often the people learned at most a few rote prayers and doctrinal statements, ignored Catholic rules on marriage, and went to confession only when death was imminent. Priests frequently left their assigned missions for long visits to Albuquerque.

Norris concentrates on the friars' loss of control throughout the eighteenth century, but even in the 1690's the real power was military. The villagers had been forcibly subjugated to the Spanish crown and its evangelistic goals. When competent friars died, men of similar quality were unavailable; missionary numbers, never large, declined further. The secular authorities, with troubles of their own, had once conscientiously supported mission work, but became indifferent or hostile. In 1776 a vigorous, devout canonical visitor, Francisco Atanasio [End Page 806] Dominguez, found himself stymied by the presence of frail, sick, callous, and disobedient men, some of publicly scandalous life. Among twenty-two priests there was a leaven of only five devoted and capable missionaries. Reforms intermittently promoted by the Bishop of Durango were ineffective.

Professor Norris, who has consulted documents in Spain and Mexico as well as in the area itself, patiently discusses each source of Franciscan decline. He puts up a few roadblocks to readers unfamiliar with Catholic terminology. He never refers to the full name of the Custody of the Conversion of Saint Paul, or to the Franciscans as the Order of Friars Minor. He makes an odd error, referring to "profession of faith" rather than profession of religious vows. He repeatedly mentions the missionaries' general inability to learn local languages. Most of them attended a Mexican seminary which offered instruction in three Mexican languages. Presumably, although Norris does not suggest this, the friars sent to the far north were those who could not learn...

pdf

Share