We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR
Exploring the Place of the Book of Chronicles in the Jewish Tradition
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Exploring the Place of the Book of Chronicles in the Jewish Tradition
A review of The Retelling of Chronicles in Jewish Tradition and Literature: A Historical Journey. By Isaac Kalimi. Pp. xx + 395. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2009. Cloth, $59.50;
The Commentary of Rabbi David Kimh. i to Chronicles: A Translation with Introduction and Supercommentary. By Yitzhak Berger. BJS 345. Pp. ix + 318. Providence, R.I.: Brown University, 2007. Cloth, $44.95;
[inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="01i" /] (The commentary on Chronicles attributed to Rashi). By Eran Viezel. Pp. 457. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 2010. Paper, $39.00.

The history of interpretation and reception is a rapidly growing field in biblical studies, as witnessed by the steady flow of books and articles on the topic and the launching of a new reference work, The Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009-), and a new annual journal, Biblical Reception (Sheffield Phoenix Press, to begin publication in October 2012). The field is vast, but one of the essential topics deserving attention is the role that the various biblical books played in the history, literature, and culture of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, something that is only beginning to be addressed. Thus, the comprehensive study of Chronicles in the history of Jewish tradition and literature by Isaac Kalimi is a welcome pioneering effort, unprecedented in the sheer scope of its coverage.

Chronicles has not traditionally been a very popular book for Jews to study. But in recent years, it has become an important subject of research for biblical scholars, among them, Isaac Kalimi, who has made the study of Chronicles the main focus of his scholarly career. He has written several monographs and many articles on the Chronicler and his work, dealing with the book of Chronicles in its historical context, as well as a classified bibliography of Chronicles scholarship. In the work here under review, he expands his range to deal with the history of interpretation and reception of the book in Jewish literature and tradition from the Second Temple Period [End Page 365] until the end of the seventeenth century, a very ambitious undertaking. This book is certainly impressive in its thoroughness and scope. Sixteen chapters cover the use of Chronicles in the Hebrew Bible, New Testament, Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Hellenistic-Greek literature (Septuagint, Judeo-Hellenistic historians, Philo of Alexandria), Dead Sea Scrolls and Cairo Genizah, Dura-Europos and cognate arts, the mosaic inscription in the ancient synagogue of En-Gedi, rabbinic literature, Targum Chronicles, Jewish liturgy and ritual, medieval Jewish biblical interpretation, the Zohar, medieval Hebrew poetry, Jewish-Christian disputations, and early modern critical scholarship (Azariah de' Rossi, Uriel da-Costa, Joseph Solomon Delmedigo, and Baruch Spinoza).

The author is certainly to be praised for his thoroughness and comprehensiveness of coverage. Hardly a stone (or better, leaf) is left unturned in his quest for references or allusions to Chronicles in post-biblical Jewish literature. Nevertheless, a study of such ambitious scope is bound to have lacunae and include some erroneous information which the reader should be aware of. The author is at his best in discussing Chronicles in late biblical and early post-biblical literature, the periods he has done most of his research on. Most of my remarks will focus on the Middle Ages, the area I am most familiar with.

I find the title of the book a little misleading. In almost every case cited, what is under review is not the retelling of Chronicles, but rather, the use of quotations from Chronicles, allusions to verses in the book, or the use of themes mentioned in it. As the author points out, there is no midrashic compilation on Chronicles, and even the late collection in Yalqut Shimoni is sparse, compared to that of other books, such as Samuel and Kings, in relation to its size. Thus, a better title would have been The Reception of the Book of Chronicles in Jewish Tradition and Literature or simply The Book of Chronicles in Jewish Tradition and Literature.

The book of Chronicles did not receive a lot of attention from medieval exegetes; in fact there are only nineteen extant...