In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Mexicans in Revolution, 1910-1946: An Introduction
  • Frank J. Klackle
Mexicans in Revolution, 1910-1946: An Introduction. By William H. Beezley and Colin M. MacLachlan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009. Pp. viii, 189. Illustrations. Notes. Index. $20.00 paper.

It never fails to impress when two prolific historians are able to come together and compose an effectual analysis of a complex moment like the Mexican Revolution and do so with elegant economy. William Beezley and Colin MacLachlan's Mexicans in Revolution, 1910-1946: An Introduction is an accessible primer to one of the most important events of Mexico's twentieth century. Their arguments are not new, but they ably clarify what is often clouded by discordant interpretations. "The first social revolution of the twentieth century," they explain, "mobilized the majority of the nation's people in a campaign to make the good life lived by the Porfirian elites available to everyone" (p. 11). Overall, Beezley and MacLachlan contend that what began as a political revolution wrought by disunity and regionalism evolved into a social revolution that forged unity through cultural nationalism and a relatively better existence for most Mexicans by the middle of the century.

Keeping in line with more traditional histories of the Mexican Revolution, the first chapter offers the requisite assessment of the Porfiriato as well as elucidation of the [End Page 602] more familiar revolutionaries: Francisco Madero, Venustiano Carranza, Álvaro Obregón, Pancho Villa, and Emiliano Zapata. It is in the next five chapters, however, where the authors make headway by adapting updated approaches and recent contributions to the historiography of the revolution. Beezley and MacLachlan go beyond the orthodox endpoint of the Constitution of 1917 to devote considerable focus to the period of consolidation during the twenties and thirties under Plutarco Elías Calles and Lázaro Cárdenas. Their attention is directed mainly toward the political: the ambitious jockeying in presidential elections, the emergence of institutionalized corporatism between party functionaries and peasant confederations, and, more importantly, the growth of labor unions. They also demonstrate that the period also witnessed the construction of a revolutionary nationalist ideal through a common cultural identity.

Mexicans in the Revolution should be praised for its efficiency and clarity, especially in light of its relatively wide scope. A little shy of two hundred pages, its value lies in the authors' ability to navigate deftly the well-known yet perplexing transformations in the country—from the downfall of the president-dictator, through a protracted, chaotic and violent period of revolutionary factionalism, and into an even longer (and perhaps more important) period of political formation and consolidation. For example, the authors' appraisal of the Partido Nacional Revolucionario's drive in the 1920s to incorporate "all revolutionary groups" through "an all-inclusive ideology" lends well to explaining the party's electoral hegemony throughout the century (p. 87).

The book's title is somewhat deceiving, as if to suggest that it is wholly a popular history of ordinary Mexicans' participation in their revolution. While the authors afford this constituency time and space, the greater part of the text is concerned with the more noteworthy historical actors. Somewhat de-emphasized is the argument of martyrdom that came to support heroes like Villa and Zapata by the 1930s; the latter is hardly mentioned again after the first chapter. The authors' continuous appraisal of the role of the United States during the motley events of this saga may cause some concern, but is probably included to satisfy the authors' intended audience of North American students. Oddly, and perhaps most disappointingly, the authors have chosen to limit their discussion of agrarian reform to a few small paragraphs buried here and there through the middle of the text. They argue that urbanization shifted the focus away from the countryside, but have difficulty reconciling this with the scale of redistribution during the Cárdenas sexenio.

Both students of history and the lay reader would benefit from reading Mexicans in the Revolution. Its brevity, combined with its clear analytical review of the major transformations and developments through the period, would provide a useful roadmap in undergraduate or graduate level courses. Beezley and MacLachlan provide an updated introduction to the...

pdf

Share