restricted access Radical Light: Alternative Film and Video in the San Francisco Bay Area 1945-2000 (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by
Radical Light: Alternative Film and Video in the San Francisco Bay Area 1945-2000 edited by Steve Anker, Kathy Geritz and Steve Seid. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A., and London, U.K., 2010. 351 pp., illus. Hardcover, paperback. ISBN: 978-0-520-24911-0; ISBN: 978-0-520-24910-3.

inline graphic "A haven for radical art and experimental film and video" is how the port city of San Francisco is described. Certainly its reputation as a multicultural center for adventurers, entrepreneurs and other individualists is well evidenced in this kaleidoscopic work of documentation and appraisal. Some 70 contributors—curators, critics, managers, artists and the filmmakers themselves—are wrangled into a compendium that more than adequately describes the scene.

As an artist filmmaker myself, who screened work in North America during a tour in the mid-1970s, I found that the vigor of activity in San Francisco left vivid memories. The reminiscences recorded here by the selected artists provide personal accounts of their work. Still, for the reader seeking the broader context, several essays capture the bigger picture: the pioneering work of the Englishmen photographer Muybridge and filmmaker Chaplin; the age of electricity; a light show manifestation called the Scintillator (1915); and television experiments in the 1920s.

The post-war period saw the establishment of a milieu with a distinct role and practice. Film appreciation at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art and film-making at the San Francisco Art Institute created an early community of activists and proto-surrealists engaged for the most part in what P. Adams Sitney wryly described as "allegories of artistic vision and creation." Baillie, Belson and Brackage later moved toward "spaces of the mind" with abstracted film forms, developing "expressionist and individual traditions" with which the San Francisco scene became most closely associated. The Vortex concerts of the late 1950s picked up where the Scintillator had left off (this legacy is continued today around the world as countless VJs manipulate the myriad laptop applications for mixing image, light and sound).

The six sections in the book divide the narrative into time periods that the editors identify as reflecting the shifts in practice, determined largely by technological and institutional change. The essay form is interspersed with "Focus" pieces on particular artworks, "Artist Page" artworks, "Cutaways" of ephemera and an Addendum on page 64.

As an ensemble of material that took some eight years to assemble, the book [End Page 70] is an extraordinary source for anyone curious about the flow of moving image artists' initiatives in San Francisco throughout the last part of the previous century. Like several other volumes published internationally about artists working with film and video, this publication indicates a general shift away from the "magic of fine art" and the expert critic toward a wider range of voices in discourse employing broader reflection in the evaluation of creative enterprise. The pitfall is a lack of editorial resolve: Too often contributors here repeat what was been established in other writers' references and histories. The repetition is liable to take a toll on the reader's patience.

There are less-historical sections: "Dialogue in Lyric," a concluding essay by Konrad Steiner, introduces recent ideas and forms, crossovers between media and cultures: Japanese renga (linked verse) and ekphrastic cinema, forms that are "both description and expression at an interface of language and image." While such thoughts appear to move toward contemporary computer-based interactive artworks, the dialogue instead turns back toward precursors in literature and artists' film. Likewise in Margaret Morse's contribution, the microprocessor becomes a re-render device for video art in installation. The viewer is able to view the work but, as with the movies, unable to touch.

It seems the editors were resolute at least in avoiding linkage with contemporary artists' ideas for expanding cinema practice. A lavishly illustrated and well-designed coffee-table book, with a full index (although no bibliography), it is a complement to the on-line Centre for Visual Music, one of the hubs in California in the continuation of the work of many of the pioneers documented in this volume.

Mike Leggett
University of Technology...