Abstract

The standard interpretation of Lyell’s argument strategy in the Principles of Geology turns the actual strategy on its head. Lyell is not arguing for a picture of the earth based upon a priori methodological assumptions, as is usually thought. Rather, he is attempting to ground a geological method upon empirical conclusions he draws about the earth and its past. Lyell’s attempt to ground a methodology upon a picture of the earth, rather than the other way around, challenges important assumptions about method and its relation to science.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1530-9274
Print ISSN
1063-6145
Pages
pp. 136-153
Launched on MUSE
2011-04-17
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.