Speclab has imaginary terms that need to be explained in more detail, such as Graphesis, Patacritical and Trialectics. Graphesis is a term that is strangely associated with what author Drucker calls "boxcar phraseology." Pataphysics is defined as "[t]he science of exceptions and of imaginary solutions," or the science of exceptions and anomalies. This sounds somewhat gloomy. It is not clear whether the term Trialectics is a derivative product of the Trivium, or [End Page 302] what we know as an introductory curriculum at a medieval university, involving grammar, logic and rhetoric, considered to be a triple way to eloquence. Under this definition, Drucker argues that it is possible to think of the term "digital aesthetics" in a more ludic way than an intellectual one. Thus, it is also possible to reinvent the role of speculation as an initial branch of creativity in computing. In this line of thought, speculation should not be understood in the most general and pejorative use or as a conviction about problems of computing based on conjecture rather than knowledge. In the main title, it is not clear why the author does not use the word "literature," commonly understood as the works of imagination instead of speculative computing. Computing usually has to be clear, effective and precise.
The book presents a reflection about the provocative term, "digital humanities," which comprehends projects of both data visualization and computational linguistics. For that reason, it explores the possibilities of XML, as a hierarchical tool for ordering systems of content. It would have been nice to have a deeper explanation of XML because the book does not explore its main possibilities as a creator of a semantic web. Comical and fascinating, the examples in the book are not pure XML, but a text that blends a script for an actor made by a theater director and XML, both styles with inaccuracies. On one side, the programming script in XML has content outside of the main tags <>; on the other side, the actor's script has embedded XML syntax:
"[or perhaps <flirtation> starts here?]
<directquote>"Really, is that what XML does?</directquote>
She asked <directquote> "Yes," </directquote>
he replied, graciously,
[or should <flirtation> start here?
Trying to catch her gaze]"
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Furthermore, there are no other computing code examples in the book, nor an explanation of any computer language. In a rather syncretic way, some religious terms are used to describe computer processes. The work has imaginary words assembled into phrases such as, "Can graphesis change mathesis?" This uncanny question with cryptic words opens the chapter "Graphesis and Code." It is not evident whether it is a word game; perhaps the author meant "Can Graphemes change Mathematics?"
With an intriguing opening, the chapter "Temporal Modeling" is a response to designs made by well-known designers such as John Maeda and other designers such as John David Miller, which the author considers non-humanistic because they are funded in discrete sciences, although it is not clearly explained why. Humanities, in her view, have more value when they are not interdisciplinary. This is a very surprising affirmation, taking into account that interdisciplinarity is a central issue in the study of digital aesthetics. This is a key topic because aesthetics is something that permeates all the sciences and not a compartmentalized and isolated field that can be separated from the realm of quotidian experience. It would have been nice to read about the role of fiction in scientific discourse and history of science, and about other authors working in the related fields such as Janet Murray, Isabelle Stengers, Sean Cubitt, Iliana Hernandez and Claudia Giannetti, among others. It is very interesting to see how the author makes an effort to reinvent the role of ludic and imaginary works in computing, but some of the graphics lack some clarity and look like sketches.