Abstract

Analytic philosophers as a species abhor logical contradictions. Yet, during the middle decades of the twentieth century, analytic philosophers in Britain offered two contradictory justifications for their discipline. On the one hand they claimed to be bold revolutionaries breaking once and for all with philosophical tradition, and on the other they cloaked themselves in the mantle of that same tradition. Why did they do this and how did they get away with it for so long? Because they justified their work differently to different audiences and because historians have uncritically accepted the "Whig narrative" that analytic philosophers told about themselves.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-329X
Print ISSN
0190-0013
Pages
pp. 161-172
Launched on MUSE
2010-04-10
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.