In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Radical History Review 79 (2001) 85-86



[Access article in PDF]

Forum: Reflections on Radical History

History and Feminism in Mexico

Gabriela Cano


The year 1979 was promising for new-wave feminism in Mexico. On March 8 of that year the National Front for the Liberation and Rights of Women (Frente Nacional por la LiberaciĆ³n y los Derechos de la Mujer--FNALIDM) was created; it gathered women's groups and leftist organizations around the topics of new feminism--autonomy of the body and the political aspect of personal life--joined in a radical Marxist discourse. Immersed in the voluntarism that characterized the left during those days, the FNALIDM was more oriented towards imagining the socialist feminist utopia than towards deepening its analysis of the complex and diverse reality of the present. Like other social utopias, the feminist socialist one searched for legitimacy in history. On the one hand, the FNALIDM reclaimed the heritage of international workers' struggles, symbolized by March 8, and, on the other, it declared itself heir of the Sole Front Pro-Women's Rights (Frente Unico Pro-Derechos de la Mujer--FUPDM), which during the 1930s, a decade of intense social mobilization in Mexico, struggled for women's suffrage and gathered many popular organizations around a program of social and economic demands of a Marxist nature.

That same year of 1979 I began my university studies of history at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, in an academic environment in which historical materialism, economic history, and the history of social movements enjoyed great popularity among students and some professors. Even when historicist positions had little prestige, they ended up being more influential in the long run. Historicism, heir of vitalistic philosophy, mistrusted the teleological sense of historical materialism while it insisted on the importance of historical interpretation and hermeneutics of documents considered complex cultural products.

My university studies and activities for the feminist movement remained unlinked until I learned about the work of the British History Workshop Movement, particularly that of Sheila Rowbotham, which showed me that the professional tools of history could be interwoven with my feminist interests. As a historian I could track the heritage of the feminist movement and contribute to building its legitimacy as a social movement of the left. My youth, professional inexperience, and voluntarism prevented me from imagining the complexity of such an endeavor.

In tune with the existing interest in my academic environment in the history of the workers' movement and social struggles, I chose for a thesis topic a teachers' strike that took place towards the end of the Mexican Revolution. I wanted to reconstruct the agency of the women teachers involved in the strike. They represented over 75 percent of the professors and had been, to borrow the title of Rowbotham's classic work, hidden from history.

I didn't succeed in my enterprise. I could only devote a few pages to describing [End Page 85] the discrimination these women teachers suffered at their jobs. Difficulties around sources and, above all, reconstruction and historical analysis turned out to be a greater challenge than I had previously foreseen.

When I first succeeded in documenting specific aspects of the history of feminism in Mexico in the twentieth century, my work was well received among feminist groups. But I still couldn't find a way to solve the methodological problems of women-centered historical research. New gender studies, particularly Joan Scott's celebrated article on gender in historical analyses, became a great inspiration for my work. Even when they did not solve the problems I faced, they opened up new avenues for critical thought.

At the onset of the 1990s, I was still interested in women teachers and their relationship with the feminist current during the first decades of the twentieth century, a topic I dwelt upon in my Ph.D. thesis, in which I got to the bottom of some aspects of the gendered cultural constructions that forged their social, professional, and political identities. I believe one can, through history, profitably meditate on matters that resist change, such as the persistent exclusion of women from...

pdf

Share