Abstract

Both historians and literary critics have linked the development of subjective interiority to the increasing possibilities for domestic privacy in the early modern period. Transformation of interior space to include withdrawing chambers, private sleeping areas, and closets provided places for the new "individual" subject to create itself. As some of these critics have acknowledged, however, spaces like closets were rarely truly private. Sources from the period (including poems, plays, diaries, memoirs, and public records) suggest that privacy for illicit activities (such as sex, gossip, and political plotting) was most often found outdoors. The association of privacy with outdoor space suggests that subject formation in the period may have been more open-ended, flexible, and environmentally influenced than has previously been thought.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1553-3786
Print ISSN
1531-0485
Pages
pp. 4-22
Launched on MUSE
2009-04-24
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.