In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The Expansion of Evangelicalism: The Age of Wilberforce, More, Chalmers, and Finney
  • Jennifer Petrafesa McLaughlin
The Expansion of Evangelicalism: The Age of Wilberforce, More, Chalmers, and Finney. By John Wolffe. [A History of Evangelicalism: People, Movements and Ideas in the English-Speaking World, Vol. 2.] (Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity Press. 2007. Pp. 280. $23.00. ISBN 978-0-830-82582-0.)

The second in a five-volume series on the 300-year global history of evangelicalism, John Wolffe’s The Expansion of Evangelicalism continues where Mark Noll’s The Rise of Evangelicalism left off with an examination of the [End Page 168] transatlantic nature of evangelicalism, as well as its place in the widely expanding English-speaking world from 1790 to 1840.

Wolffe emphasizes the diversity of experience among evangelicals during this second phase by looking at the movement not only in the United States and the British Isles but also Australia, Canada, the West Indies, and South Africa. A close analysis of primary sources, such as church archives, religious tracts, private and public papers of major and minor evangelical figures like Thomas Chalmers and Hannah More, and Christian magazines and newspapers, allows Wolffe to demonstrate the relatively rapid increase in the number of people who called themselves evangelicals by the early-nineteenth century and their impact on society and politics.

While Wolffe describes the period known as the “Second Great Awakening,” he correctly points out that even though religious enthusiasm varied according to geography, social class, and denomination, revivalism never completely died out in either America or England in the years between the two awakenings. By the early 1800s, evangelicalism was expanding once again because of camp meetings on the American frontier and in rural and industrial England, revivalism among Americans in the North and West, as well as a growing emphasis on millennialism.

He clearly has done his research. It is apparent who these evangelicals were and what they heard from ministers such as Charles Finney, but readers looking for answers to why men and women were called to conversion have to wait until one-third of the way into the book. That is where Wolffe considers the question of motivation and historical context. Refusing to accept extremes on either end of the spectrum (the Holy Spirit at work or economic determinism), Wolffe acknowledges worldly factors at play, such as good press, industrialization, geography, disease, and even climate, but does not allow these factors to undercut the spiritual ones that brought people to Christ; instead, “‘social’ approaches are viewed as complementary rather than antagonistic to ‘spiritual’ ones” (p. 89).

Evangelicals had an enormous impact on social reform between 1790 and 1840, but Wolffe argues that they were especially successful when they were willing to join political or nonevangelical forces to work for change, as was the case with William Wilberforce and the campaign to end the slave trade.

Wolffe effectively highlights the transatlantic nature of evangelicalism, but is always sure to point out important differences as well. For example, slavery and race shaped the ways in which evangelicals sought to carry out reform in the United States, sometimes even causing irreparable rifts within denominations, leading to divisions within the Methodist and Baptist churches by the 1850s. In England, however, this kind of dissension occurred over the issue of church and state, especially with regard to the treatment of Roman Catholics. While some evangelicals supported civil equality, others [End Page 169] opposed Catholic emancipation because they believed Protestantism defined them as Britons.

An especially noteworthy chapter on spirituality and worship focuses on the dual nature of evangelicalism in which individuals experience an intensely personal relationship with God within a group context, such as a revival or a Bible society. Evangelicals of all denominations shared common experiences, but in the end, the personal nature of evangelicalism cannot be overstated. This conclusion runs throughout Wolffe’s work, supporting his argument that whatever judgments evangelicals made about the people or societies they sought to help or change, they did so because they wanted everyone to answer God’s call.

Jennifer Petrafesa McLaughlin
Sacred Heart University
...

pdf

Share