Reviewed by:
  • Milk and Blood: Gender and Genealogy in the ‘Chanson de Geste’
Milk and Blood: Gender and Genealogy in the ‘Chanson de Geste’. By Finn E. Sinclair . Oxford, Peter Lang, 2003. 292 pp. Pb £34.00.

Finn Sinclair has taken as her starting point the writings of Kristeva, Irigaray and Lacan, which she then applies to several epics, in particular Raoul de Cambrai, Berte as grans pies, Aye d'Avignon, Ami et Amile, La Naissance du Chevalier au Cygne, Parise la Duchesse and the Provençal epic Daurel et Beton. Her interest lies in the symbolism of two liquids associated with women, milk, which nourishes the infant — in these cases always male — and blood, which is significant in two ways, the blood line descending through the mother and menstrual blood. Her interpretation of the significance of milk works particularly well in the case of Daurel, where the lactating Aisilineta is tortured to make her reveal the whereabouts of Boves's son and heir and the milk and blood spurt from her breasts under the torture. This was one of the most interesting parts of the book as Sinclair's analysis of the relationship between Boves and Gui is thorough and convincing and brings out clearly the extent to which women were subordinate to and ignored by the men in their families. She seems to underplay the role of Beatris in Raoul de Cambrai, however, who is surely one of the few women in epic to carve a distinctive role for herself, perhaps because of the obvious influence of romance on this section of the poem. Sinclair considers that epic affords a greater role to mothers than romance (p. 67), which is perhaps rather sweeping, and she also argues that 'roles open to female characters in the chanson de geste have long been recognised as more varied and nuanced than those of other genres', which could also be contested. The comparison of Parise with the Virgin seems rather forced. It is a pity that she does not translate her German quotations, and there is one misprint 'whom she knows is a murderous traitor' (p. 245). Those familiar with the writings of Kristeva and Lacan will probably find this book very much to their taste. Those who are less familiar with them or undergraduates may well find the more theoretical parts of the text very heavy going, which would be a pity as the analysis of the actual poems is always challenging and worth reading.

Peter Noble
University of Reading

Additional Information

Print ISSN
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.