Abstract

A decade's worth of criticism lauds Beloved for mourning the trauma of American slavery. However, much of this criticism is limited by the boundaries of trauma-theory. Alternatively, an analysis of property-rights in Beloved, focusing on the legal problem of "claiming," demonstrates that claiming is an act of psychical self-possession as well as a formal demand for property rights. Claiming property presupposes but also produces the individual freedom of the one making the claim. We may therefore read Beloved as creating an imperative case for reparations for slavery and Jim Crow segregation, drawing on theories of liberal justice and reconciliation.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1080-658X
Print ISSN
0026-7724
Pages
pp. 415-439
Launched on MUSE
2006-07-20
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.