-
Healers, Healing, and Child Well-being: Ideologies, Institutions, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean
- Latin American Research Review
- University of Texas Press
- Volume 40, Number 2, 2005
- pp. 176-192
- 10.1353/lar.2005.0018
- Review
- Additional Information
Latin American Research Review 40.2 (2005) 176-192
[Access article in PDF]
Healers, Healing, and Child Well-being:
Ideologies, Institutions, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean
Anne-Emanuelle Birn
As scholars from a wide range of disciplines are increasingly discovering, Latin America and the Caribbean provide rich and complex venues in which to examine the worlds of sickness, healing, and healers. Virtually every setting in the region can point to a growing bibliography on themes, including the protean but growing state role in regulating [End Page 176] the public's health; the social cleavages and mutual values revealed during particular epidemics; medical professionalization and the emergence of healing hierarchies; and the political and ideological shaping of medicine, both domestically and internationally. The blossoming of work in this area stems from a variety of factors, ranging from institutional developments—such as the marvelous research and teaching resources at the Casa Oswaldo Cruz in Rio de Janeiro—to the establishment of specialized journals and networks of scholars, to contemporary political concerns about the breakdown of social policies and the deterioration of health conditions across the region, to theoretical and conceptual trends relating to contact and conflict among different healing cultures.
The books reviewed in this essay cover several of the most dynamic themes in this literature: the complicated relationship among physicians, competing medical ideologies, and the state; the historic and contemporary vibrancy and demand for a wide array of healers and healing systems; and the health and social conditions of children, past and present.
In a previous LARR review essay on this field of inquiry (34, no.3, 1999), Ann Zulawski pointed out that the new generation of scholars of medicine and society in Latin America had invariably rejected an older belief in the enlightened diffusion and progress of Western ideas and practices in the Americas. By aiming their critique at the rise of medical hegemony, however, some of the studies of the 1990s unwittingly repeated the unidirectional diffusion narrative but interpreted it as a form of social control and professional self-interest. In a matter of just a few years, a more finely hued tableau has been painted of places and periods of medical syncretism, of fierce rivalries, and of the coexistence—sometimes uneasy, sometimes happy—of a range of healing cultures.
Steven Palmer's From Popular Medicine to Medical Populism: Doctors, Healers, and Public Power in Costa Rica, 1800-1940 is among the finest of these new histories of medical and health institutionalization in Latin America. Beautifully written and drawing from an impressive range of archival sources, journals and newspapers, legal proceedings, and personal reports, he traces the intersecting trajectories of herbalists, empirics, midwives, pharmacists, several grades of doctors, and other healers from colonial times to the launching of Costa Rica's modern exemplar of rapid public health advancement.
Palmer's overarching argument is that—although Costa Rica exhibited most of...