In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Children of Facundo. Caudillo and Gaucho Insurgency during the Argentine State-Formation Process (La Rioja), 1853–1870
  • David Rock
Children of Facundo. Caudillo and Gaucho Insurgency during the Argentine State-Formation Process (La Rioja), 1853–1870. By Ariel de la Fuente (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2001. 249 pp. $18.95)

Children of Facundo is a landmark study on several counts. The book stands out as one of the first examples of “history from below,” illustrating the role of followers, as well as leaders, as the protagonists of provincial rural guerrilla movements in nineteenth century Argentina. Common enough in other countries, this approach is rare in Argentina, in which the careers of authoritarian leaders dominate the historiography. In de la Fuente’s work, the gauchos represent the main actors in the “history from below” approach. The author defines the gauchos differently from conventional usage. Here, the term refers not only to the wandering cowboy outlaws made famous by the epic poem Martín Fierro, but also to all low-ranking members of rural society, including peasant farmers. The author examines the popular culture of the gauchos, drawing upon a rich collection of popular songs from the nineteenth century.

De la Fuente’s book differs from conventional historiography in focusing on La Rioja, a single province in the Argentine interior. Always one of the poorest provinces, La Rioja stands in the arid sub-Andean region in the west, in another world from Buenos Aires and the pampas, which form the grist of most historical studies on Argentina. This book differs from the few other good studies of the interior provinces in reaching down within La Rioja to the level of the departamento or county. De la Fuente analyzes the contrasting departamentos of Famatina and Los Llanos, the former an area of conflict between large landowners and the rural [End Page 1017] population and the latter the focal point of the guerrilla movement throughout western Argentina. Concentration on two quite different local societies yields important insights into the relations between partisan loyalties, landowning, rural social class, and ethnicity.

Previous historians viewed the Unitarios and Federales, the self-styled political parties in Argentina during this period, as mere factions competing only for the spoils of office. Using Famatina and Los Llanos as illustrations, De la Fuente finds more substantive differences. In La Rioja, the Federales had a “mass” following of gauchos, but the Unitarios only the support only of a small elite. Extreme conflict in Famatina reflected a scarcity of land and concentration of land ownership, conditions that engendered class conflict between the elite and masses. With a very small population until around 1800, Los Llanos then attracted internal migrants of part-African origin, who commonly became cattle-raisers. The more open society of Los Llanos facilitated a vertical alliance of landowners and gauchos. In Los Llanos, people became less aware of ethnic differences than in Famatina, where a sense of racial separation and antagonism between whites and indigenous people grew quite pronounced. As an indicator of ethnic separation among the indigenous communities of Famatina, religious practices of Inca origin survived.

De la Fuente notes the importance in La Rioja of the merced, a colonial land grant that by the mid-nineteenth century produced the comuneros, the people living off the land comprising the merced. In forming an extended family enjoying use of the land in common, the comuneros appeared reminiscent of the Scottish Highland clans before 1745. The comuneros suffered a similar fate as the clansmen. In the 1860s, military defeat followed by the individual appropriation of land destroyed many of the mercedes and the comuneros (although a few survived in La Rioja). The civil wars in the Argentine interior became conflicts between two forms of society. The Federalist gauchos and comuneros represented the old society derived from the mercedes, while the Liberals or ex-Unitarios represented the new society embodied by private ownership of land.

Caudillismo represents one of the main concerns of the book. De la Fuente emphasizes that the clientele, as well as the leaders, created the charismatic authority and other subjective and cultural attributes of the caudillos. The caudillos acquired quasi-kinship links with their...

Share