In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Beyond Carnival: Male Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century Brazil
  • Susan Besse
Beyond Carnival: Male Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century Brazil. By James N. Green (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1999. xiii plus 408pp.).

James Green’s Beyond Carnival explores the creativity and resilience of the gay male subculture in Brazil from the late 19th century to the end of the 1970s, when the Brazilian gay rights movement emerged. The setting is Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil’s two major cities, and mecca for gay men from the nation’s hinterland as well as from abroad. Himself a resident of São Paulo from 1977 to 1981 and participant in the emerging gay rights movement, Green draws on interviews with a wide range of gay men, as well as a variety of written sources, including: medical records; depositions of transvestites arrested during police sweeps; the discourses on homosexuality by medical and legal “experts;” materials from the mainstream press; two generations of gay journals; and works of literature and popular culture. From these sources, Green paints a rich and complex picture of gay life across boundaries of race, class, and generation; and he maps the geography of homoerotic sociability within the parks, cabarets, movie theaters, cafés and bars, boardinghouses and cheap hotels that gay men shared with the larger population of Rio and São Paulo. Despite Brazilian homophobia—-evident in police harassment, pseudo-scientific research, brutal hate crimes, social ostracism, and economic marginalization—-Green exposes tensions between toleration and repression that afforded gay men opportunities to carve out spaces and prominent social roles for themselves.

Green questions the degree to which Brazil’s hierarchical sexual/gender system determined the actual sex role behavior of gay men, rigidly dividing them into two mutually exclusive categories: the homen (“real” man who takes the active role) and the bicha (effeminate male who plays the passive role). Earlier studies have argued that it was not until the 1960s that middle-class gay men in Brazil adopted a new sexual identity based on sexual-object choice rather than gender roles. Indeed, Green demonstrates that Brazilian physicians who studied homosexuality from the 1920s to 1940s tended to associate male homosexuality with effeminacy and passive anal sexuality, largely ignoring the “active” partner. But in these same medico-legal studies, Green finds evidence of gay men whose behavior did not fit neatly into the bipolar categories of homen/bicha. The most famous case is “Madame Satã,” whose image as a “queen” contradicted his reputation as a dangerous criminal willing to fight and even kill to defend his honor. Other men switched roles from “real” men to bichas, sometimes shocking their partners as well as unsettling the medical and legal professionals who assumed the necessity of the active/passive model. Although all gay men drew from stereotypical images of masculinity and femininity to fashion their gendered personas, Green shows how some used these images in ambiguous ways and engaged in fluid and shifting erotic behavior that defied categorization. “Reality,” he reminds us, “proves richer than the construct.”

Green devotes one chapter to describing and analyzing the homosexual appropriation of Rio’s Carnival, from the elite masquerade balls of the 1930s, to the drag balls of the 1950s, to the samba school parades of the 1960s and beyond. [End Page 470] Contesting DaMatta’s interpretation of Carnival as a temporary inversion of roles and leveling of social differences, Green sees Carnival as providing gay men the “opportunity for an intensification of their own experiences as individuals who transgress gender roles and socially acceptable sexual boundaries the entire year.” (203) For three days, they can discard the masks they wear for the other 362 days and join together in solidarity with other homosexuals apart from (rather than with) the larger community. Their participation, Green argues, has not only transformed Carnival, but has increased public awareness of homosexuality, undermined rigid normative definitions of masculinity and femininity, expanded acceptable manifestations of sensuality and sexuality, and fostered social toleration. Nevertheless, their success was only achieved through decades of protracted struggle, and thanks to large doses of humor as well as jesting responses to police harassment. If they have definitively...

Share