From:
Human Rights Quarterly
Volume 26, Number 4, November 2004
pp. 983-1027 | 10.1353/hrq.2004.0051
Can the transformation of the Organization of African Unity into the African Union and the adoption of the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) really make a difference for human rights on the African continent? This article sets out the commitments of the new African continental instruments in relation to democracy and the rule of law and concludes that they are useful and important—but also that NEPAD in particular has significant deficiencies. The second half of the article sets out five themes that should receive greater attention if true effort is to be made to address Africa's problems.
-
If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.
-
-
You are not currently authenticated.
-
View freely available titles: Book titles OR Journal titles
-


Purchase from JHU Press