In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Hispanic American Historical Review 81.3-4 (2001) 782-783



[Access article in PDF]

Book Review

La mosaïque indienne: Mobilité, stratification sociale et métissage dans le corregimiento de Cuenca (Equateur) du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle


La mosaïque indienne: Mobilité, stratification sociale et métissage dans le corregimiento de Cuenca (Equateur) du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle. By Jacques Poloni-Simard. Civilisations et Societes, 99. Paris: Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, 2000. Maps. Tables. Figures. Notes. Glossary. Bibliography. Index. 514 pp. Paper.

Jacques Poloni-Simard studies the evolution of the Indian community in Cuenca (present day Ecuador) between 1557 and 1780. He analyzes the economic situation in the region, as well as the institutions implemented by the Spaniards, in order to evaluate Indian response and adaptation to them. He suggests that three distinct periods existed. The first (1557-1619) was a period of destruction and exploitation. During this period, Indian effort was mainly directed at conserving the most essential of their traditions and at adapting to the new reality. The second period (1620-80), on the contrary, was a period of growth. In it, different individuals and groups invented new ways to deal with the situation. Social differentiation inside the Indian group was growing, as was mestizaje. Finally, in the third period (1680-1780), encroachment on Indian land and Indian labor was especially strong. As a result, new adaptation mechanisms were called upon and the distinction between Indians "who remained Indians" and those who did not, became especially noteworthy. Poloni-Simard stresses that response to challenges and adaptation to changing circumstances were carried out on both an individual and a collective level. Individual Indians responded to new situations by recasting themselves anew through immigration, through modifying their economic activities and through constructing social networks that expanded beyond their original community. The Indian collectivity responded by changing solidarity patterns, by modifying the importance of different authorities within the community and by adopting new communal practices.

Poloni-Simard insists that, despite the existence of a single legal category of "Indian," a category mainly tied to fiscal obligations levied by the colonial state, in reality, there were many distinct Indian groups. Indians varied according to their [End Page 782] places of residence (urban or rural), according to their professions, wealth and connections. If this internal variation inside the Indian group is not surprising, and would be typical of any other category, such as Spaniards or nobles, it is nevertheless true that Poloni-Simard's research demonstrates the degree to which internal differences were both substantial and meaningful. Among other things, these differences contributed to the emergence of the "plebe," that is, of the popular urban classes that were no longer defined according to race or ethnicity, but that were characterized instead by reference to their socioeconomic (common) experience. His vision of Indianness allows for the most important conclusion of the book. Miscegenation, it is argued, was first and foremost social. Indians who immigrated to the city, for example, often continued to marry into their "ethnic" group. Yet they became "mestizos" by virtue of their connections with and integration in the non-Indian world. These connections extended their social and economic relations, as demonstrated by the identity of people whom they chose as creditors and debtors, as witnesses and as testament executors. The division between Indians and mestizos was thus social and cultural rather than biological. Indeed, there was a continuum rather than a rupture between one group and the other. Yet while urban centers were a favorable space for this kind of miscegenation, they could also be spaces in which Indianness reenforced itself and was reproduced and reinvented. Indeed, most Indians arriving to the city became mestizos, yet some remained within an Indian social space which was restructured in the city.

Another important feature of this book are the sources and methodology it uses. Sources mainly include notarial records, which allow the author to examine the activities (and strategies) of individual Indians. We are thus exposed...

pdf

Share